Five Porphyrin-Core-dependent Metal–organic Frameworks and Framework-Dependent Fluorescent Properties

Chao Zou,Ming-Hua Xie,Guo-Qiang Kong,Chuan-De Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ce25357g
IF: 3.756
2012-01-01
CrystEngComm
Abstract:The reaction of 5,10,15,20-tetra(carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (H6TCPP) or metalated M-H4TCPP (M = CoII, NiII, CuII and VIVO) with lead nitrate afforded five metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), [Pb2(H2TCPP)]·4DMF·H2O (1), Pb2(Co–TCPP)(H2O)(DMF)]·1.5DMF (2), [Pb2(Ni–TCPP)(DMF)(H2O)]·1.5DMF·2H2O (3), [Pb2(Cu–TCPP)(DMF)(H2O)]·1.5DMF·2H2O (4) and [Pb2(VO–TCPP)(H2O)2]·4DMF (5). Single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the five MOFs based on the TCPP scaffolds differ in framework topologies and porphyrin configurations that are varied from flat to wavy to bowl-shaped. The porphyrin cores play a pivotal role in the formation of the distinct coordination frameworks by controlling the stacking fashion of the porphyrins, the coordination modes of TCPP and the coordination spheres of the Pb2+ cations. Solid-state photoluminescent experiments suggest that the emissions of these compounds are dependent on the framework structures, and are insensitive to the porphyrin cores.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?