Entangled Metal–Organic Frameworks of M-Phenylenediacrylate Modulated by Bis(pyridyl) Ligands

Qian Sun,Yan-Qin Wang,Ai-Ling Cheng,Kun Wang,En-Qing Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cg201432w
IF: 4.01
2012-01-01
Crystal Growth & Design
Abstract:Solvothermal reactions of m-phenylenediacrylic acid (H(2)mpda) and zinc(II) salts in the presence of different bis(pyridyl) ancillary ligands afforded a series of supramolecular interpenetrated coordination architectures with formula [Zn(mpda)(bpee)](n) (1), [Zn(mpda)(bpea)](n) (2), and [Zn(mpda)(bpp)](n)center dot 2.5H(2)O (3) (bpee = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethylene, bpea = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane, bpp = 1,3-bis(4-pyridyl)propane). X-ray analyses revealed that all of the compounds feature tetrahedral-based coordination geometry around Zn(II), two-dimensional (2D) 4(4) coordination networks with different linkers, and parallel 2D -> 2D interpenetration, which is stabilized by interlayer hydrogen-bonding interactions. The arc-shaped mpda ligand collaborates with quasi-linear bpee or bpea to generate 2D achiral networks with chair-shape windows in 1 and 2, but with two different arc-shaped ligands (mpda and bpp); the single network in 3 is homochiral and has boat-shaped windows. The different shapes of the networks result in different interpenetration modes. Both networks of 1 and 2 exhibit 3-fold parallel interpenetration and give trilayers. Differently, two layers of the same handedness in 3 interpenetrate to give a homochiral bilayer featuring double helical motifs, and the alternating stacking of oppositely handed bilayers renders the compound racemic. The interpenetration mode and the formation of the double helices in 3 benefit not only from the arc shape of the two bridging ligands but also from the match of the two ligands in length.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?