Joint Use of Chitosan-Pga Nerve Guidance Conduits and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells to Repair 50mm Long Median Nerve Defect Combined 80mm Long Ulnar Nerve Defect in the Human Upper Arm
Gu Jianhui,Gu Xiaokun,Deng Aidong,Qian Zhongwei,Xue Chengbin,Gu Yun,Yi Sheng,Liu Dan,Gu Xiaosong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fbioe.2016.01.02190
IF: 5.7
2016-01-01
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Abstract:Event Abstract Back to Event Joint use of chitosan-PGA nerve guidance conduits and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to repair 50mm long median nerve defect combined 80mm long ulnar nerve defect in the human upper arm Jianhui Gu1, Xiaokun Gu1, Aidong Deng1, Zhongwei Qian1, Chengbin Xue2, Yun Gu2, Sheng Yi2, Dan Liu1 and Xiaosong Gu2 1 Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Hand Surgery Department, China 2 Nantong University, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Neuroregeneration, China Purpose: The repair of peripheral nerve defects over long-distance is a tough problem in the clinics.This case study was performed to observe the repair outcomes and safety after surgical repair of long-distance peripheral nerve defect in the upper arm by implantation of chitosan–PGA nerve guidance conduits combined bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells[1]-[8]. Methods: A 29 year-old woman, who was injured with 50mm long median nerve defect and 80mm long ulnar nerve defects combined the muscle and blood vessel disruption in the right upper arm, received an emergency surgery to repair the soft tissue and restore the blood vessel connection. The nerve defect were repaired by implantation of chitosan-PGA nerve guidance conduits joint MSCs[9]-[14] in the 40th day after injury. After surgical repair, a series of functional assessments were carried out in different times. Motor function was evaluated by the recovery of the joint movement and strength which supplied by the injured nerves. Sensory recovery was assessed by two-point discrimination and touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Autonomic function monitored by Laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) and ninhydrin test. We observed changes of nerve conduits and nerve regeneration in human body through MRI, ultrasonic and electrophysiological. Blood and urinary routine tests, serum biochemical examinations including the hepatic and renal function tests were taken to monitor the safety of the nerve graft after surgery[14]. Results: Six months post-implantation, the sweat secretion and cutaneous blood perfusion of the right hand showed increase, indicated the recovery of autonomic function. The range of the wrist flexion and finger abduction, adduction increased indicated the recovery of the motor function. But the patient felt obviously numb of her right hand, the same as pre-implantation. MRI and ultrasonic showed nerve conduits partially absorbed and regeneration of nerve fibers. No anomalies in blood and urinary routine and serum biochemical examinations were detected. No complications were observed. Conclusions: The results indicate that as an alternative to nerve autografts, chitosan–PGA nerve guidance conduits combined MSCs could be a effective and safe choice for repairing extended nerve defects in human[14]-[16]. Figure 1. General observation of the injured right upper arm of the patient.(A) The muscle, blood vessel and nerve disruption in the right upper arm. (B) Appearance of the right upper arm 6 months post implantation. (C) Intra-operative view of the 50mm-long median nerve defect. (D) Surgical repair of the median nerve and ulnar nerve defects.(E)(F) The wrist joint can be moved from the hyperextended to 0 degree flexion, against gravity. (G) Finger abduction. (H) Finger adduction. (I) The nerve conduits and nerve regeneration in human body through ultrasonic 2 months post implantation. (J) The ulnar nerve repaired by chitosan–PGA nerve guidance conduits combined MSCs was observed through MRI 6 months post implantation. (K) The cutaneous blood perfusion of the right hand before surgical repair.( L) The cutaneous blood perfusion of the right hand showed increase 6 months post implantation. (M) The cutaneous blood perfusion of the normal side, Patient's left hand. We thank Mengqi Xu for isolating the bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.References:[1] Pittenger M，Mackay A，Beck S，et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells.Science.1999,284（5411）：143[2] Paniushin O, Domaratskaia E, and Starostin, V. Mesenchymal stem cells: sources，phenotype，and differentiation potential. Izv Akad Nauk Ser Biol, 2006, 33(1):6.[3] Munoz-Elias G, Woodbury D, Black IB, et al. Marrow stromal cells, mitosis, and neuronal differentiation: stem cells and precursor functions. Stem Cells. 2003, 21(4):437[4] Woodbury D, Schwarz E, Prockop D, et al. Adult rat bone marrow stromal cells diffentiate into neurons. J Neurosci Res 2000, 61(4):364[5] Deng J, Petersen BE, Steindler DA, et al.Mesenchymal stem cells spontaneously express neural proteins in culture, and are neurongenic after transplantation. Stem Cells.2006, 24(4): 1054[6] Keilhoff G, Goihl A, Langnase K, et al. Transdifferentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into Schwann cell-like myelinating cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006, 85(1):11[7] Crigler L, Robey RC, Asawachaicharm A, et al. Humman mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations express a variety of neuro-regulatory molecules and promote neuronal cell surivival and neuritogenesis. Exp Neurol. 2006, 198(1):54[8] Yaghoohi MM, Mowla SJ. Differential gene expression pattern of neurotrophins and their receptors during neuronal differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells. Neurosci Lett. 2006, 397(1-2):149[9] Lin WW, Chen X, Wang XD, et al. Adult rat bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into Schwann cell-like cells in vitro. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2007, 44(1-2):31[10] Hou SY, Zhang HY, Quan DP, et al. Tissue-engineered peripheral nerve grafting by differentiated bone marrow stromal cells. Neuroscience 2006, 140(1):101[11] Chen X, Wang XD, Chen G, et al. Study of in vivo differentiation of rat bone marrow cells into Schwann cell-like cells. Microsurgery. 2006, 26(2):111[12] Wang X, Hu W, Cao Y, Yao J, Wu J, Gu X. Dog sciatic nerve regeneration across a 30-mm defect bridged by a chitosan/PGA artificial nerve graft. Brain 2005, 128:1897–1910.[13] Makinnon SE, Dellon AL. Clinical nerve reconstruction with a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid tube. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990, 85(3):419[14] Fan W, Gu J, Hu W, Deng A, Ma Y, Liu J, Ding F, Gu X. Repairing a 35-mm-long median nerve defect with a chitosan/PGA artificial nerve graft in the human: a case study. Microsurgery. 2008;28(4):238-42[15] Yuan Y, Zhang PY, Yang YM, et al. The interaction of Schwann cells with chitosan membranes and fibers in vitro. Biomaterials, 2004,25(18):4273[16] Xue C, Hu N, Gu Y, Yang Y, Liu Y, Liu J, Ding F, Gu X.. Joint use of a chitosan/PLGA scaffold and MSCs to bridge an extra large gap in dog sciatic nerve. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jan;26(1):96-106. Keywords: Tissue Engineering, in vivo, Tissue Regeneration, clinical application Conference: 10th World Biomaterials Congress, Montréal, Canada, 17 May - 22 May, 2016. Presentation Type: Poster Topic: Regenerative medicine: biomaterials for control of tissue induction Citation: Gu J, Gu X, Deng A, Qian Z, Xue C, Gu Y, Yi S, Liu D and Gu X (2016). Joint use of chitosan-PGA nerve guidance conduits and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to repair 50mm long median nerve defect combined 80mm long ulnar nerve defect in the human upper arm. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Conference Abstract: 10th World Biomaterials Congress. doi: 10.3389/conf.FBIOE.2016.01.02190 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 27 Mar 2016; Published Online: 30 Mar 2016. Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Jianhui Gu Xiaokun Gu Aidong Deng Zhongwei Qian Chengbin Xue Yun Gu Sheng Yi Dan Liu Xiaosong Gu Google Jianhui Gu Xiaokun Gu Aidong Deng Zhongwei Qian Chengbin Xue Yun Gu Sheng Yi Dan Liu Xiaosong Gu Google Scholar Jianhui Gu Xiaokun Gu Aidong Deng Zhongwei Qian Chengbin Xue Yun Gu Sheng Yi Dan Liu Xiaosong Gu PubMed Jianhui Gu Xiaokun Gu Aidong Deng Zhongwei Qian Chengbin Xue Yun Gu Sheng Yi Dan Liu Xiaosong Gu Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.