Subcutaneous Administration of Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Expressing an Ag85b-Esat6 Fusion Protein, but Not an Adenovirus-Based Vaccine, Protects Mice Against Intravenous Challenge with Mycobacterium Tuberculosis

Q. You,C. Jiang,Y. Wu,X. Yu,Y. Chen,X. Zhang,W. Wei,Y. Wang,Z. Tang,D. Jiang,C. Wang,X. Meng,X. Zhao,W. Kong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2011.02629.x
2011-01-01
Scandinavian Journal of Immunology
Abstract:Recombinant virus-based tuberculosis (TB) vaccines that are strongly immunogenic and elicit robust cellular immunity are considered ideal vaccine candidates. Here, we engineered a poxvirus-based vaccine, MVA85B-E6, and an adenovirus-based vaccine, AD85B-E6, both of which express the fusion protein Ag85B-ESAT6. Subcutaneous vaccination of AD85B-E6 generated strong interferon (IFN)- gamma production by both CD4 and CD8 T cells and CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocyte activity; these results indicate that strong T-helper type 1 immune responses were elicited in mice, which is in contrast to the moderate responses induced by vaccination with MVA85B-E6. However, MVA85B-E6 given subcutaneously led to levels of protection comparable with that induced by the bacillus CalmetteGuerin vaccine in the lungs and spleens, whereas AD85B-E6 given subcutaneously did not show any protective efficacy after intravenous challenge of BALB/c mice with Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. Our study emphasizes that more efficient biomarkers for vaccine efficacy and more appropriate routes of vaccine administration are necessary for the development of a successful TB vaccine.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?