Toxicogenomic Mechanisms Of 6-Ho-Bde-47, 6-Meo-Bde-47, And Bde-47 In E. Coli

Guanyong Su,Xiaowei Zhang,Hongling Liu,John P. Giesy,Michael H. W. Lam,Paul K. S. Lam,Maqsood A. Siddiqui,Javed Musarrat,Abdulaziz Al-Khedhairy,Hongxia Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es203212w
IF: 11.4
2012-01-01
Environmental Science & Technology
Abstract:Cytotoxicity of 6-HO-BDE-47 and its two analogues, BDE-47 and 6-MeO-BDE-47, and the associated molecular mechanisms were assessed by use of a live cell reporter assay system which contains a library of 1820 modified green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressing promoter reporter vectors constructed from E. coli K12 strains. 6-HO-BDE-47 inhibited growth of E. coli with a 4 h median effect concentration (EC50) of 22.52 +/- 2.20 mg/L, but neither BDE-47 nor 6-MeO-BDE-47 were cytotoxic. Thus, 6-HO-BDE-47 might serve as an antibiotic in some living organisms. Exposure to 6-HO-BDE-47 resulted in 65 (fold change >2) or 129 (fold change >1.5) genes being differentially expressed. The no observed transcriptional effect concentration (NOTEC) and median transcriptional effect concentration (TEC50) based on transcriptional end points, of 6-HO-BDE-47 were 0.0438 and 0.580 mg/L, respectively. The transcriptional responses were 514- and 39-fold more sensitive than the acute EC50 to inhibit cell growth. Most of the genes that were differentially expressed in response to 6-HO-BDE-47 were not modulated by BDE-47 or 6-MeO-BDE-47. These results suggest that cytotoxicity of 6-HO-BDE-47 to E. cob was via a mechanism that was different from that of either BDE-47 or 6-MeO-BDE-47. Gene expression associated with metabolic pathways was more responsive to 6-HO-BDE-47, which suggests that this pathway might be the primary target of this compound.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?