Environmental Inequality of Personal Exposure to PM2.5 and Black Carbon (BC) Within- and Between- Communities in Rural Beijing, China
Xiaoying Li,Ellison Carter,Jill Baumgartner,Christopher Barrington Leigh,Sam Harper,Brian Robinson,Guofeng Shen,Talia Sternbach,Shu Tao,Xiang Zhang,Yuanxun Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/isee.2021.p-685
2021-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Socioeconomic and spatial patterning of personal exposure to air pollution have not been well documented in rural Chinese settings where household solid fuel use is still a major contributor to air pollution. To better understand how air pollution exposures are distributed in settings like these, we investigated personal exposure patterning by social, demographic, and economic factors within- and between- villages in rural Beijing, where a heating energy program is underway to substitute coal with electricity and natural gas. METHODS: We randomly recruited 446 participants in 50 villages from four (of 13) districts in Beijing and measured 24-h personal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and black carbon (BC). We administered a comprehensive survey to collect detailed household socio-demographic information, stove and fuel use patterns, and applied principle component analysis (PCA) to construct a composite index (wealth index) to better represent participants' socioeconomic status (SES). RESULTS:Overall, geometric mean (95% confidence interval) exposures to PM2.5 and BC were 75 (68-82) and 2.6 (2.4-2.8) μg/m3, respectively, ranging at the village-level from 23-387 μg/m3 and from 0.8-11 μg/m3, respectively. Within villages, the highest measured PM2.5 exposures were, on average, 20 times higher than the lowest (range: 3.5-187). Overall, PM2.5 and BC exposures did not vary systematically by SES, although they were slightly concentrated among the poorest 20% of participants, who represented 23% of PM2.5 and 25% of BC exposure by total personal exposure, while the wealthiest 20% represented 17% of PM2.5 and 14% of BC exposure by total personal exposure. CONCLUSIONS:SES did not show a pronounced association with the disparities of exposures to household air pollution in this study. This study addresses critical knowledge gaps on how exposures to household air pollution are distributed by social and demographic factors and aids design of interventions to control household air pollution emissions in settings like rural Beijing. KEYWORDS: Environmental inequality, personal exposure, fine particulate matter (PM2.5), black carbon (BC), residential coal combustion, socioeconomic status