Abstract:Behavioural choice modelling is growing in interest as a framework to understand the decision-making of shippers, freight forwarders and other freight agents. Since the 1980s, we have witnessed an increasing number of freight behaviour studies, primarily the freight mode choice, where the roles of one or more freight decision-makers has been addressed, which was neglected in the traditional aggregate approach to freight demand modelling. Stated preference techniques have become a main approach to establishing the role of attributes that define the key drivers in the freight distribution chain. The underlying theory of choice is based on the neoclassical economic assumption that a decision-maker, in choosing, acts as if they are a utility maximizer (working to deliver a profit maximization or cost minimization outcome for the freight business), and this utility maximizing behaviour engenders a population theory of Random Utility Maximization (RUM). Despite the continuing appeal of the RUM framework in applied travel choice studies, a number of specific application assumptions have been questioned by studies in psychology and behavioural economics, arguing that the decisions made by agents are often conditioned on a number of underlying psychological components, one of which is risk attitude. This paper reviews recent freight behaviour studies established on RUM, and presents a major limitation of adopting a risk-neutral assumption through its linear utility specification. Using an existing freight stated choice data set, a nonlinear utility model is estimated which reveals risk-taking attitudes of transporters and shippers. An alternative behavioural paradigm, Rank-Dependent Utility Theory (RDUT), is introduced and incorporated to better accommodate trip time variability, a feature of growing importance in transport systems (passenger and freight). The proposed attribute-specific extended RDUT framework that accommodates the attitude towards risk and preference in freight transport behaviour modelling requires new data, which we detail.

Gasoline price volatility and auto market demand

Exploring vehicle preference dynamics: Analyzing the influence of oil price volatility on consumer car purchase decisions - A comparative survey experiment

Sensitivity of Vehicle Market Share Predictions to Discrete Choice Model Specification

Queuing to refuel before price rise in China: How do gasoline price changes affect consumer responses and behaviours?

Do Unprecedented Gasoline Prices Affect the Consumer Switching to New Energy Vehicles? An Integrated Social Cognitive Theory Model

A prospect theoretical choice model incorporating profitable and punctual uncertainties: an investigation in the participation of private car sharing

Travel Choice Behaviour under Uncertainty in Real-Market Settings: A Source-Dependent Utility Approach

An Electricity Price Model with Consideration to Load and Gas Price Effects.

Modeling Parking Choice Behavior Using Cumulative Prospect Theory

Study of Asset Pricing:A New Advancement Based on loss Aversion,Catching up With the Joneses and the Formation of the Habit

An Agent-Based Modeling Approach for The Diffusion Analysis of Electric Vehicles with Two-Stage Purchase Choice Modeling

An Optimal Short-term Natural Gas Purchase Decision Making Model

The effect of record-high gasoline prices on the consumers’ new energy vehicle purchase intention: Evidence from the uniform experimental design

Search with learning in the retail gasoline market

Accommodating Risk Attitudes in Freight Transport Behaviour Research

Risk aversion in green energy-efficient vehicle-petrol supply chain based on C-VaR model with government intervention: a game theoretic approach

Research on the Diffusion Model of Electric Vehicle Quantity Considering Individual Choice

Choice Models and Permutation Invariance: Demand Estimation in Differentiated Products Markets

Simpler is better: Predicting consumer vehicle purchases in the short run

Accounting for Differences in Modelled Estimates of RP, SP and RP/SP Direct Petrol Price Elasticities for Car Mode Choice: A Warning