Landscapes with locality in urban or rural areas
Fang Wang,Martin Prominski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20938321
2020-01-01
Indoor and Built Environment
Abstract:The built environment is how human beings express themselves spatially in the course of history. As one of the most important concepts of the built environment in the theory of human-land relationships, ‘place’ is formed by the combination of natural and human factors. While ‘place’ is defined as a space that is relevant, historical and related to identity, a space that does not have these characteristics is a ‘non-place’. ‘Locality’ comprises the basic characteristics of a place, such as its natural and cultural characteristics, which provides the key to demonstrate and maintain the inhabitants’ self-identity, culture and local identity. An ‘urban or rural landscape with locality’ constitutes the surface landscape formed by interactions between human activities and the natural environment of a specific place. There are two opposing views of ‘locality’. One is that the need for locality has become obsolete. In this view, rationality takes precedence over emotion or personality in modern society, modern technology aims at function and efficiency. ‘Generic cities’ without personality, history and centre have become a fact in urban development, but Koolhaas has been also uncomfortable with the ubiquity of modernity in cities. Another view is that we must adhere to supporting locality to preserve our culture. From a phenomenological standpoint, a sense of place is essential to human beings. The preservation of locality would satisfy human and citizen’s needs of emotional affiliation and social identity. So, planning and design should express and illustrate respect for locality or the spirit of place. Designing for a new locality is another important issue. The development and revival of locality design, rather than preserving historical sites in their original state, i.e. museumization, require a structured treatment of the meaning and experience of locality, responding at different levels to specific situations. However, in the practice of locality responses, the fashion and concept of the place are expressed in colourful symbols, signs or fragments, forming a space with unclear features that can be copied everywhere, thus replacing the original, colourful and profound local places. At the same time, there is also the problem of dualism, that natural landscape and artificial landscape are perceived as opposites. We believe that locality is very important and must be upheld.