Abstract:The normal vector of migration direction in the solid-liquid interface of dendrites was used to describe the phase-field governing equation. By using the three angles formed by the normal vector for the migration direction of the dendritic growth interface and the coordinate axes of the simulation region, the authors expressed the interfacial anisotropy equation, and built a phase-field model for the competitive growth of multiple grains. Taking a Al-2%mole-Cu binary alloy as an example, the competitive growth of multiple grains during isothermal solidification was simulated by applying parallel computing techniques. In addition, the phase field simulation results were verified by the experimental method. The simulation results show that the competitive growth of equiaxed dendrite is divided into two types: the first occurs during the process of competitive growth, the tips of primary dendrite on different grains taking part in the competition stop growing in their optimal growth direction; the second also occurs during competitive growth, the tips of primary dendrite which participate in the competition on different grains never stop growing in their optimal growth direction. The dendritic morphologies of the first competition growth type are divided into two types. Primary dendrites of grains taking part in the competition stop growing in their optimal growth direction and the competition plane enlarges when neither one wins the competition. However, when one wins the competition, the primary dendrites of grains with superiority go through the blocking grains and continue to grow in their optimal growth direction. The primary dendrites of inferior grains stop growing in their optimal growth direction and then instead grow in those areas without obstacles. The dendritic morphology of the second competition-growth type is shown to be the deformation of primary dendrites, which are mainly represented as the deflection and bending observed from different views. Compared with the metallographic picture, the simulation results can show the morphology of the competitive growth in all directions, so this simulation method can better characterize the competitive growth process.

Simulation of Atypical Dendrite Growth in Ni–Cu Binary Alloy with Phase-Field Method

Phase-field Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Competitive Growth of Dendrites in a Binary Alloy

Numerical Simulation of Dendrite Growth for Binary Alloy During Non-Isothermal Solidification

Influence of Anisotropy on Dendritic Growth in Binary Alloy with Phase–Field Simulation

Phase-field Modeling of Free Dendritic Growth in Binary Alloy under Forced Flow

Phase-Field Simulation of Non-Isothermal Dendritic Growth of Binary Alloy

Phase-field simulation of binary alloy during directional solidification

Multi-Phase Field Simulation of Grain Growth in Multiple Phase Transformations of A Binary Alloy

Phase-Field Simulation Studies of Dendrite Growth Coupling with Force Flow Field

Numerical Simulation of Three-Dimensional Dendritic Growth Using Phase-Field Method

Phase-field simulation of seaweed-like growth morphology of directionally solidified Ni-Cu alloy

Phase-field Simulation of Secondary Dendrite Growth in Directional Solidification of Binary Alloys

Effect of Material Parameters on Dendritic Patterns of Ni-Cu Binary Alloy Using Phase-Field Simulation

Phase-field simulation of isothermal solidification of binary alloy based on KKS model

Numerical Simulation of Solute Segregation Patterns for a Binary Alloy Using Phase-Field Approach

Influence of Anisotropy Degree on Dendrite Growth in Ni-Cu Binary Alloy Using the Phase Method

Phase-field Simulation of Competitive Growth of Grains in a Binary Alloy During Directional Solidification

Simulation of Dendritic Growth of Multicomponent Alloys Using Phase-Field Method

Phase-Field Simulation Studies of Multiple Grains Coupled with Force Flow Field

Phase-Field Model of Isothermal Solidification of Binary Alloy with Multiple Grains

Phase-field Simulation of Dendritic Growth for Binary Alloys with Complicate Solution Models