0623 Effects of Nasal and Upper Airway Surgery on Pharyngeal Collapsibility in People with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Amal Osman,Danny Eckert,Andrew Carney,Eng Ooi,Himani Joshi,Phuc Nguyen,Peter Catcheside
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0623
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Upper airway surgery reduces obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. However, therapeutic efficacy varies between patients and inter-individual effects on upper airway physiology post-surgery are not well characterized. Nasal surgery alone may help facilitate breathing and CPAP delivery but would not be expected to yield major reductions in upper airway collapsibility per se. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess changes in upper airway collapsibility following nasal and upper airway surgical procedures. Methods People with OSA attended the sleep laboratory prior to and ≥3 months following nasal or upper airway surgery. At each visit, airway collapsibility via the upper airway collapsibility index (UACI) technique was assessed just prior to sleep and OSA severity was quantified during overnight polysomnography. To quantify the UACI, participants were instrumented with pressure sensors at the choanae and epiglottis, a sealed nasal mask and pneumotachograph. They were studied awake (verified via EEG) and supine. Brief (250ms) negative pressure pulses were delivered during early inspiration and early expiration (~-12cmH2O at the mask) every 2-10 breaths. The UACI, which correlates well with the critical closing pressure (Pcrit) during sleep, was quantified as the percent difference between nadir choanal and the corresponding epiglottic pressure to ~20 negative pressure pulses. Results 7 participants (2 female), aged 47±12years, BMI 29±2kg/m2 with severe OSA had either upper airway surgery (uvulopalatopharyngoplasty combined with coblation channelling of the tongue, n=4) or nasal surgery alone (n= 3). Participants with upper airway surgery had a 58% reduction in upper airway collapsibility (40±18 vs. 17±22%, p=0.049) during early inspiration with similar improvements during expiration (63±9 vs. 38±30%, p=0.01). For nasal surgery only, upper airway collapsibility was not systematically different during early inspiration or expiration. Conclusion These preliminary findings indicate major improvements in upper airway collapsibility during wakefulness following upper airway surgery but no systematic changes with nasal surgery alone. Further application of these physiological measures may help explain between patient differences in therapeutic efficacy with upper airway surgery and assist with patient selection to improve treatment success rates. Support (if any) DJE reports funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (1065571).
neurosciences,clinical neurology