Measurement Scale Effect on Prediction of Soil Water Retention Curve and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity
Behzad Ghanbarian,Vahid Taslimitehrani,Guozhu Dong,Yakov A. Pachepsky
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1502.02511
2015-02-09
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
Abstract:Soil water retention curve (SWRC) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (SHC) are key hydraulic properties for unsaturated zone hydrology and groundwater. In particular, SWRC provides useful information on entry pore-size distribution, and SHC is required for flow and transport modeling in the hydrologic cycle. Not only the SWRC and SHC measurements are time-consuming, but also scale dependent. This means as soil column volume increases, variability of the SWRC and SHC decreases. Although prediction of the SWRC and SHC from available parameters, such as textural data, organic matter, and bulk density have been under investigation for decades, up to now no research has focused on the effect of measurement scale on the soil hydraulic properties pedotransfer functions development. In the literature, several data mining approaches have been applied, such as multiple linear regression, artificial neural networks, group method of data handling. However, in this study we develop pedotransfer functions using a novel approach called contrast pattern aided regression (CPXR) and compare it with the multiple linear regression method. For this purpose, two databases including 210 and 213 soil samples are collected to develop and evaluate pedotransfer functions for the SWRC and SHC, respectively, from the UNSODA database. The 10-fold cross-validation method is applied to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the proposed regression-based models. Our results show that including measurement scale parameters, such as sample internal diameter and length could substantially improve the accuracy of the SWRC and SHC pedotransfer functions developed using the CPXR method, while this is not the case when MLR is used. Moreover, the CPXR method yields remarkably more accurate soil water retention curve and saturated hydraulic conductivity predictions than the MLR approach.