Abstract:This article reviews China's energy and climate strategies in the electric power, industrial, building, and transport sectors. These four sectors account for about three-quarters of China's total energy consumption and energy-related carbon emissions. We identify major gaps in China's energy and climate polices based on the status quo: first, command-and-control policies not only are costly, but also cannot accommodate the transition of energy consumption from production sectors to consumption sectors; second, unsmooth deployment of renewable energy poses challenges for decarbonizing China's electricity system. To close these gaps, we suggest two policy priorities: a carbon market to achieve cost-effective emission reduction, and a Renewable Quota System to promote the utilization of renewable energy. Challenges associated with these policies are discussed. Furthermore, we suggest that a sectoral approach can serve as a first step for China to make meaningful commitments under a prospective international climate treaty. In particular, the cement, steel, and aluminium sectors can be among the first groups to join this sectoral approach. Policy relevance We argue that China's sectoral climate policies should prioritize both the development of a carbon market to achieve cost-effective carbon mitigation and the improvement of renewable supporting polices to foster long-term renewable technology investment. However, to fully explore the advantages of a carbon market, we suggest that more stringent emission caps should be set at the national level. In addition, the carbon market and existing energy and climate policies should be carefully harmonized. In particular, the overlaps between existing command-and-control mitigation polices and the carbon market should be reduced to improve cost-effectiveness. In parallel with a carbon market, we suggest a second-best policy, the Renewable Quota System, as a supplement to the carbon market to foster green technology development and to create preconditions for a more stringent cap. At the international level, a sectoral approach can serve as a first step for China to make meaningful commitments under a prospective international climate treaty. In particular, the cement, steel, and aluminium sectors can be among the first group to join this sectoral approach.

Sectoral Crediting Mechanism: How Far China Has to Go

Closing the Gap Between Carbon Neutrality Targets and Action: Technology Solutions for China’s Key Energy-Intensive Sectors

Scenario Study on Regional Allocation of CO2 Emissions Allowance in China

Sectoral Crediting Mechanism: How to Work in China

Carbon Markets in China: Development and Challenges

Challenges to the development of carbon markets in China

International Cooperation Mechanisms for Carbon Reduction

A new carbon emission reduction mechanism: Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP)

New Market Mechanism and Its Implication for Carbon Reduction in China

China's sectoral strategies in energy conservation and carbon mitigation

A conjoint analysis of corporate preferences for the sectoral crediting mechanism: a case study of Shanxi Province in China

Potential Analysis of Clean Development Mechanism Put into Effect in China

Comparison of CO2 Emission Scenarios and Mitigation Opportunities in China's Five Sectors in 2020

Clean Development Mechanism Practice in China: Current Status and Possibilities for Future Regime

Key challenges for China's carbon emissions trading program

International Market Mechanism under Paris Agreement: Insights from China

The evolving role of carbon finance in promoting renewable energy development in China

Potential analysis of dean development mechanism put into effect in China

Barriers and Opportunities of Using the Clean Development Mechanism to Advance Renewable Energy Development in China

Sector Mitigation Policies and Methods in China: Measurable, Reportable, and Verifiable Mechanisms

China׳s Carbon Mitigation Strategies: Enough?