Abstract:A basic underlying assumption in most of the research to date is that intermediate industry accounts of the economies in multiregional input-output (MRIO) tables exist and are accurate. In fact, if they exist at the subnational level, such accounts are, at best, roughly estimated and predicated on far less empirical information than is available for economies of nations. Moreover, intra- economy intermediate-industry flows are typically larger than the set of a region's commodity in- and out-flows. So, if intermediate industry flows in a set of MRIO accounts are noticeably mis-estimated, it follows that interregional trade coincidentally derived using them must be even more conspicuously in error. We hypothesize as more information is used to estimate MRIO accounts, the better the estimates should be. We start our experiment by consolidating 2019 FIGARO accounts of the 27 member states of the European Union, while maintaining sectoral detail, to produce a "national account". We then test several approaches to constructing MRIO tables. The approaches distribute interregional trade fully by receiving industry, as in FIGARO, as well as strictly in the form of a diagonalized matrix as if the commodity inflows are competitive imports. To do this, both a gravity model and RAS are applied to each approach. We then test to see how well the approaches estimate main features of FIGARO's MRIO accounts and detail a rather consistent ranking of the relative accuracy of them. We also find that the level of error inherent to the estimated MRIOs is markedly similar across approaches, particularly for multipliers. Further, relaxing interregional trade to a diagonalized matrix tends to add very little error. The approach that uses the least data is, however, markedly worse in replicating countries' direct requirements matrices and Leontief inverses, which suggests its use in a more-limited set of applications.

DISAGGREGATING INPUT–OUTPUT MODELS WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION

DISAGGREGATING THE ELECTRICITY SECTOR OF CHINA'S INPUT-OUTPUT TABLE FOR IMPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT

Decomposition of aggregate CO 2 emissions within a joint production framework

A New Method for Interindustry Linkage Analysis Based on Demand-Driven and Multisector Input-Output Model and Its Application in China's Manufacturing and Producer Services

Decomposing the Change of CO2 Emissions: A Joint Production Theoretical Approach

Carbon emissions and driving forces of China’s power sector: Input-output model based on the disaggregated power sector

Upstreamness and downstreamness in input-output analysis from local and aggregate information

Input–Output Analysis of China’s CO2 Emissions in 2017 Based on Data of 149 Sectors

A Hybrid‐Unit Energy Input‐Output Model to Evaluate Embodied Energy and Life Cycle Emissions for China's Economy

A Quasi-Input-Output Model to Improve the Estimation of Emission Factors for Purchased Electricity from Interconnected Grids

Investigating Reasons for Differences in the Results of Environmental, Physical, and Hybrid Input‐Output Models

Using a Linear Regression Approach to Sequential Interindustry Model for Time-Lagged Economic Impact Analysis

Estimating China ’ s Inter-provincial Commodity Trade Coefficients

Output Elasticities and Inter-Factor Substitution: Empirical Evidence from the Transportation Sector of Shanghai

Compilation of an Embodied CO2 Emission Inventory for China Using 135-Sector Input-Output Tables

Estimating Transformity ( UEV ) with Economic Input-Output Models

Estimating Inter-Regional Trade Flows in China: A Sector-Specific Statistical Model

Input-output table of electricity demand and its application

Input-output models for carbon accounting: A multi-perspective analysis

Driving forces and mitigating strategies of CO2 emissions in China: A decomposition analysis based on 38 industrial sub-sectors

Revisiting Methods for Estimating Interregional Input-Output Accounts: It's Not Just About Trade Flows