Zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotopic systematics of Late Paleozoic volcanic from the western margin of east Junggar and tectonic implication

Ji'an Shi,Xianglu Tang,Shuncun Zhang,Hongfu Zhang,Yan Xiao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2012.04.003
2012-01-01
Abstract:Two sections, namely Baijiangou and Zhangpenggo, in the western margin of east Junggar, where expose a large number of Paleozoic volcanic rocks, are the favorable areas to study the tectonic evolution of the east Junggar. LA-MC-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic systematics study of igneous rocks(basalt, basaltic andesite, rhyolite and keratophyre with minor tuff and syenite-porphyry), using geochrony technology, suggests that they were formed during Early Devonian to Late Carboniferous(400~307 Ma). Basalts and basaltic andesites are more likely output as dikes, and they display age-range from 435 Ma to 300 Ma and show positive εHf(t) values(+0.7~+15.4), which suggests that the east Junggar terrane is controled by juvenile crust and that the Precambrian crystalline rocks must be very limited, if there is any. The Zhangpenggou rhyolite and keratophyre, zircon U-Pb ages of 332 Ma and 336 Ma respectively, were formed in a volcanic arc environment or a environment which was mixed with part of island arc. The Baijiangou syenite-porphyries with positive εHf(t) values in Late Carboniferous(307 Ma and 315 Ma) indicate a vertical accretion of crustal materials. The Baijiangou rhyolites which show positive εHf(t) values and zircon U-Pb ages of 315 Ma and 323 Ma suggests a lateral accretion of crustal materials. Therefore, the east Junggar is mainly accretionary prism undering extensional settings of post-collisional period, and it's considered today to be a Paleozoic Mariana-type intra-oceanic island arc.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?