Abstract:It is important to analyze the failure in safety-critical system because a disaster may occur once any type of failure mode and/or failure effect is neglected or misjudged. In order to conduct the failure analysis more effectively and efficiently, the concept of formal modeling is introduced. This paper improved the model-based safety analysis (MBSA) working process to optimize the formal failure analysis approach of safety-critical system. As the core works of MBSA process, the formal modeling and model extension aim to build an integrated system model which can be used for analyzing the failure behaviors in the system by model checking. However, in order to automatically check if there are any potential failures in the structured system model and whether the model satisfies the specified system properties and requirements using model checker, model transformation is normally needed, which can introduced potential errors during the transformation. Moreover, different model checkers generally require the system models to be expressed in a particular input language, which increases the difficulty of modeling as well. In order to avoid these problems and improve the efficiency of failure analysis work, this paper focused on how to build an unified model of safety-critical system quickly and accurately using symbolic language SMV, and conduct automatic verification using the corresponding open-source model checker NuSMV soon afterwards. After the model checking, the formal verification results such as counter-examples generated by model checking need to be transformed into traditional failure analysis artifacts, such as FMEA and/or FTA, to guide the iterative improvement of system development conveniently. Therefore, to solve the transformation from formal verification conclusions to traditional failure analysis results is another key point of this paper. Finally, a case study about airborne equipment is provided to validate the proposed method.

Model-driven Safety Dependence Verification for Component-based Airborne Software Supporting Airworthiness Certification

Formal Verification Of Airborne Software Safety Requirement

A Modeling Methodology to Facilitate Safety-Oriented Architecture Design of Industrial Avionics Software.

A Verification Method of Software Safety Model Based on Model Checker

Safety SysML: an Executable Safety-Critical Avionics Requirement Modeling Language

A FACE-based Simulation and Verification Approach for Avionics Systems

A Simulation and Verification Platform for Avionics Systems Based on Future Airborne Capability Environment Architecture

Design and implementation of Safety_SysML consistency verifier for avionics software

Ensuring Safety of Avionics Software at the Architecture Design Level: An Industrial Case Study

Research on Formal Verification Technique for Aircraft Safety-Critical Software

Formal Analysis and Verification of Airborne Software Based on DO-333

An AADL Model-Based Safety Analysis Method for Flight Control Software

Formal Modeling of Airborne Software High-Level Requirements Based on Knowledge Graph.

Architecture-level Hazard Analysis Using AADL.

Research for aircraft system safety analysis method based on model checking

An approach for design and formal verification of safety-critical software

Finite automata models of software safety analysis

A Fault Propagation Modeling and Analysis Method Based on Model Checking

A Contract-based Approach to Specifying and Verifying Safety Critical Systems

An Improved Formal Failure Analysis Approach for Safety-Critical System Based on MBSA

Integrated Modeling, Verification, and Code Generation for Unmanned Aerial Systems