Abstract:Objective To evaluate and compare the caries prevention effectiveness of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer sealant on permanent first molars in 7-to 9-years-old school children. Methods A randomized controlled, examiner-blinded, 5-year clinical trial was conducted in 19 primary schools in Dalian, Liaoning province. Totally 419 children (with 664 first molars) who had at least one sound permanent first molar with deep fissures or fissures with signs of non-cavitated lesions were recruited and stratified and allocated randomly into three parallel groups. A resin-based sealant was used in Group R (136 children with 219 first molars) and a glass ionomer sealant was used in Group G (130 children with 218 first molars). The third group (Group N, 153 children with 227 first molars) with none of the two sealants applied was served as blank control. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 years after sealing in order to assess the retention of the sealants and the incidence of caries occurrence. Chi-square test was adopted to compare the differences of caries incidence among the 3 groups. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) was used to analyze the effective factors of caries incidence. Results During the 5-year follow-up period, 13.4% (23/172) of the teeth in Group R, 22.5% (40/178) of the teeth in Group G and 34.5% (57/165) of the teeth in Group N were diagnosed as having developed cavitated lesions. And the differences in the incidence of caries among the three groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). According to GEE, the resin-based sealant and the glass ionomer sealant were found to be the protection factors and the non-cavitated lesion before sealing was found to be the risk factor. The resin-based sealant was found to be the protection factor to the glass ionomer sealant when the blank control group was removed. Conclusions Both resin-based sealant and glass ionomer sealant could effectively prevent the permanent first molars from the occurrence of carious lesions in 5 years. The resin-based sealant was superior to the glass ionomer sealant in caries prevention.

Caries-preventive Effect of Sealants Produced with Altered Glass-Ionomer Materials, after 2 Years.

Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and resin-based sealant on partially erupted permanent first mo-lars

Effectiveness of Two New Types of Sealants: Retention after 2 Years

Do Light Cured ART Conventional High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomer Sealants Perform Better Than Resin-Composite Sealants: A 4-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

[Caries Prevention Effect of Resin Based Sealants and Glass Ionomor Sealants].

Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.

Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants:a report of 5-year-follow-up

Frequency of Remnants of Sealants Left Behind in Pits and Fissures of Occlusal Surfaces after 2 and 3 Years

One-year Clinical Evaluation of Retention Ability and Anticaries Effect of a Glass Ionomer-based and a Resin-based Fissure Sealant on Permanent First Molars: An In Vivo Study

Methods and Preliminary Findings of A Cost-Effectiveness Study of Glass-Ionomer-Based and Composite Resin Sealant Materials after 2Yr

Clinical evaluation of a surface pre-reacted glass (S-PRG) filler-containing dental sealant placed with a self-etching primer/adhesive

Marginal Leakage of Two Newer Glass-Ionomer-based Sealant Materials Assessed Using Micro-Ct

Cost-Effectiveness, in A Randomized Trial, of Glass-Ionomer-Based and Resin Sealant Materials after 4Yr

Sealing moderate caries lesions with bioactive glass-ionomer: A split-mouth clinical trial

Retention of moisture-tolerant fluoride-releasing sealant and amorphous calcium phosphate-containing sealant in 6–9-year-old children: A randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of Glass Ionomer Cement as Pit and Fissure Sealant in Permanent First Molars

Effectiveness of glass-ionomer sealant versus fluoride varnish application to prevent occlusal caries among preschool children over 18-24 months – A randomised controlled trial.

Enamel Surface with Pit and Fissure Sealant Containing 45S5 Bioactive Glass

Evaluation of Glass-Ionomer versus Bulk-Fill Resin Composite: A Two-Year Randomized Clinical Study

Comparative evaluation of retention, cariostatic effect and discoloration of conventional and hydrophilic sealants - A single blinded randomized split mouth clinical trial

A Three-year Clinical Evaluation of Two Light Cured Materials for Preventing Technique