An Organ-Specific Approach to the Management of Gestational Hypertension: Evidence versus Tradition
Steven L. Clark,George A. Saade,Mary C. Tolcher,Michael A. Belfort,Dwight J. Rouse,Robert M. Silver,Avni Kapadia,Nathan C. Sundgren,Sai K. Saridey,Baha M. Sibai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2459-8748
2024-11-28
American Journal of Perinatology
Abstract:The management of hypertensive disease in pregnancy is currently guided by practice recommendations based largely on observational data from a half century ago and has changed only superficially since that time. These recommendations are both narrowly prescriptive (women without traditional features of severe disease should all be delivered at exactly 37 0/7 weeks) and at the same time frustratingly ambiguous (the presence of epigastric pain unresponsive to repeat analgesics precludes expectant management at any gestational age, regardless of laboratory studies). Guidelines that ignore recent data from the obstetric, pediatric, and internal medicine literature too often lead practitioners to be more aggressive than necessary in the delivery of very premature pregnancies, and, conversely, more complacent than patient safety would support in prolonging pregnancy with advanced fetal maturity. We present here an alternative, organ-specific-based approach to the management of gestational hypertension that allows and encourages practitioners to formulate a management plan based on a thoughtful and, when possible, evidence-based synthesis of the continuous variables of blood pressure, degree of organ dysfunction and response to treatment, gestational age, and patient balancing of maternal and fetal/neonatal risks. Such clinical care is more complex and nuanced than simply basing life-altering critical management decisions, including timing of delivery, on whether the patient does, or does not have any one of the conditions described by box 4 of the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice guidelines. Nonetheless, we believe this approach will not only improve care but will also open the door to useful investigations into prevention and management of the various entities traditionally considered as the same disease process. Key Points Traditional approaches to preeclampsia are not evidence based. The use of such approaches has resulted in stagnant maternal morbidity and mortality ratios. The consideration of disease severity as binary is particularly counterproductive. An organ-based approach will facilitate evidence-based individualization of care. Received: 02 July 2024 Accepted: 14 October 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 04 November 2024 Article published online: 25 November 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology