Survival impact of homologous recombination deficiency in veterans with cholangiocarcinoma including mutual exclusivity with pathogenic KRAS and TP53.

Colin P. Bergstrom,Ethan Samuel Lin,Eric G. Mehlhaff,Dyan M. Lesnik,Noelle K. LoConte,Sam Joseph Lubner,Kristina A. Matkowskyj,Monica Arun Patel,Sean Ronnekleiv-Kelly,Nataliya Volodymyrivna Uboha,Megan Wachsmann,David H. Wang,Albert Y. Lin,Jeremy D. Kratz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.3_suppl.546

IF: 45.3

2024-01-23

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:546 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The US Veteran Health Administration’s (VHA) National Precision Oncology Program (NPOP) was established to characterize pathogenic drivers across the integrated VA network. Here, we summarize an important subgroup of CCA with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and its impact on overall survival (OS). Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using FoundationOne CDx Analysis included clinicopathological, molecular alterations including, single nucleotide variants, gene amplification/loss, and gene fusion/rearrangements obtained from centralized data of the VHA’s Corporate Data Warehouse. Homologous recombination deficiency was defined by pathogenic variant mutations (MT) in ARID1A, ATM, ATR, BAP1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDK12, CHEK2, FANC, NBN, PALB2, and RAD51. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared test for concurrent gene enrichment and log-rank Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 483 CCA samples underwent tissue NGS as standard of care. Pathogenic variants in HRD genes included ARID1A (15.5%, n=75), BAP1 (9.5%, n=46), ATM (2.7%, n=13), PALB2 (2.3%, n=11) and BRCA (2.0%, n=10), representing 31.7% (n=153) of the population. HRD mutations were found in similar proportions of localized (31.8%) and metastatic (31.5%) clinical presentations at diagnosis. OS was not significantly different between CCA with HRD mutations (12.3 mo WT vs. 13.8 months with HRD MT, p=64). KRAS MT (n=77, 15.9% of population) did not impact OS (WT 12.3 mo v. MT 13.1 mo) including subgroup analysis stratified by HRD status. There was increased frequency in KRAS MT with HRD WT 18.5% versus HRD MT10.4% (p<0.03). Additionally, there was increased frequency in TP53 MT with HRD WT 54.8% versus HRD MT 28.1% (p<0.00001). TP53 MT (n=224, 46.3% of population) conferred inferior OS (WT 12.3 mo v. MT 13.1 mo) including subgroup analysis stratified by HRD status. Subgroup analysis of TP53 MT had worsened OS with concurrent HRD MT (n=39, 4.1 mo) v. HRD WT (n=158, 9.0 mo; p<0.04). Conclusions: Across a diverse integrated healthcare system of Veterans, mutations associated with HRD were found to be common, however, not prognostic in OS across a diverse patient population of CCA. Further work is needed to clarify exposure to platinum containing chemotherapy. TP53 MT CCA remains a critical unmet need that drives worsened outcomes including here in patients with mutations in HRD. Future analysis should consider mutation signatures of HRD, loss in heterozygosity of HRD, and platinum exposure to further define the subgroups of CCA with mutations in HRD. [Table: see text]

oncology