Abstract:Motivation Pricing decisions are often made when market information is still poor. While modern pricing analytics aid firms to infer the distribution of the stochastic demand that they are facing, data-driven price optimization methods are often impractical or incomplete if not coupled with testable theoretical predictions. In turn, existing theoretical models often reason about the response of optimal prices to changing market characteristics without exploiting all available information about the demand distribution. Academic/practical relevance Our aim is to develop a theory for the optimization and systematic comparison of prices between different instances of the same market under various forms of knowledge about the corresponding demand distributions. Methodology We revisit the classic problem of monopoly pricing under demand uncertainty in a vertical market with an upstream supplier and multiple forms of downstream competition between arbitrary symmetric retailers. In all cases, demand uncertainty falls to the supplier who acts first and sets a uniform price before the retailers observe the realized demand and place their orders. Results Our main methodological contribution is that we express the price elasticity of expected demand in terms of the mean residual demand (MRD) function of the demand distribution. This leads to a closed form characterization of the points of unitary elasticity that maximize the supplier’s profits and the derivation of a mild unimodality condition for the supplier’s objective function that generalizes the widely used increasing generalized failure rate (IGFR) condition. A direct implication is that optimal prices between different markets can be ordered if the markets can be stochastically ordered according to their MRD functions or equivalently, their elasticities. Using the above, we develop a systematic framework to compare optimal prices between different market instances via the rich theory of stochastic orders. This leads to comparative statics that challenge previously established economic insights about the effects of market size, demand transformations and demand variability on monopolistic prices. Managerial implications Our findings complement data-driven decisions regarding price optimization and provide a systematic framework useful for making theoretical predictions in advance of market movements.

Optimal policy against distortions caused by monopolistic competition and variable markup pricing

Online Learning and Pricing for Multiple Products with Reference Price Effects

The Optimality of Constant Mark-Up Pricing

Optimal Indirect Taxes and Subsidies under Imperfect Competition

Monopolistic Competition and Optimum of Product Diversity

Regulating Oligopolistic Competition

Optimal Pricing Strategy for Durable-Goods Monopoly

Monopolistic Competition When Income Matters

Optimal consumer sales tax policies for online‐offline retail operations with consumer returns

Robust Monopoly Regulation

Optimal policy choice and asymmetric information in a mixed market

Optimal Taxation with Misperception on Prices

Monopoly pricing in vertical markets with demand uncertainty

Equilibrium Analysis of Markup Pricing Strategies under Power Imbalance and Supply Chain Competition

Flexible Demand Manipulation

Joint pricing and advertising strategy with reference price effect

On-demand ride-hailing platforms in competition with the taxi industry: Pricing strategies and government supervision

Optimal Mixed Taxation with Misperceptions of Prices

Competition for territories under the switching cost

Monopolistic Competition, As You Like It

Quantifying the Gap between Equilibrium and Optimum Under Monopolistic Competition