Efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in the posterior cerebral circulation—a single center study

Michał Borończyk,Mikołaj Kuźniak,Agnieszka Borończyk,Amadeusz Żak,Łukasz Binek,Anna Wagner-Kusz,Anetta Lasek-Bal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57963-6
IF: 4.6
2024-04-03
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the current standard treatment for strokes in the anterior cerebral circulation (AMT) and has recently been proven to be beneficial in the posterior circulation strokes (PMT). Our study aims to evaluate parameters for favorable outcomes in PMT-patients and to compare the clinical characteristics of individuals who received AMT and PMT. For this purpose, we confronted AMT and PMT-receipients and performed a multivariate regression analysis to assess the influence of factors on favorable outcomes in the study group and in the AMT and PMT subgroups. When analysing 623 MT-patients, those who received PMT had significantly lower admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (9 vs. 13; p < 0.001) and 24 h post-MT (7 vs. 12; p = 0.006). Key parameters influencing the favorable outcomes of PMT at discharge and at 90th day include: NIHSS scores (OR: 0.865, 95% CI: 0.813–0.893, and OR: 0.900, 95% CI: 0.861–0.925), MT time (OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.987–0.998 and OR: 0.993, 95% CI: 0.990–0.997), and leukocytosis (OR: 0.961, 95% CI: 0.928–0.988 and OR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.957–0.998). Different clinical profiles exist between AMT and PMT-recipients, with the neurological status post-MT being decisive for the prognosis. Several factors play an important role in predicting outcome, especially in the PMT group.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of evaluating the efficacy and safety of post-circulation mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and comparing it with anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy (AMT) to identify key factors affecting the functional prognosis of PMT patients. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Evaluate the efficacy and safety of PMT**: By analyzing the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of PMT patients, assess the efficacy and safety of PMT in treating posterior circulation stroke. 2. **Compare the clinical characteristics of AMT and PMT patients**: Explore the differences in baseline characteristics between AMT and PMT patients, including age, gender, NIHSS score at admission, etc. 3. **Identify key factors affecting the prognosis of PMT patients**: Through multivariable regression analysis, determine which factors significantly impact the short-term (at discharge) and long-term (after 90 days) functional prognosis of PMT patients. 4. **Construct a predictive model**: Based on the above analyses, construct an effective model to predict the prognosis of PMT patients, excluding multicollinearity, overly correlated variables, and interactions between variables. The main purpose of the study is to provide clinicians with useful information regarding the treatment effects and prognosis of PMT through these analyses, thereby optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.