Abstract:Introduction: In swimming, it is necessary to understand and identify the main factors that are important to reduce active drag and, consequently, improve the performance of swimmers. However, there is no up-to-date review in the literature clarifying this topic. Thus, a systematic narrative review was performed to update the body of knowledge on active drag in swimming through numerical and experimental methods. Methods: To determine and identify the most relevant studies for this review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach was used. Results: 75 studies related to active drag in swimming and the methodologies applied to study them were analyzed and kept for synthesis. The included studies showed a high-quality score by the Delphi scale (mean score was 5.85 ± 0.38). Active drag was included in seven studies through numerical methods and 68 through experimental methods. In both methods used by the authors to determine the drag, it can be concluded that the frontal surface area plays a fundamental role. Additionally, the technique seems to be a determining factor in reducing the drag force and increasing the propulsive force. Drag tends to increase with speed and frontal surface area, being greater in adults than in children due to body density factors and high levels of speed. However, the coefficient of drag decreases as the technical efficiency of swimming increases (i.e., the best swimmers (the fastest or most efficient) are those with the best drag and swimming hydrodynamics efficiency). Conclusion: Active drag was studied through numerical and experimental methods. There are significantly fewer numerical studies than experimental ones. This is because active drag, as a dynamical phenomenon, is too complex to be studied numerically. Drag is greater in adults than in children and greater in men than in women across all age groups. The study of drag is increasingly essential to collaborate with coaches in the process of understanding the fundamental patterns of movement biomechanics to achieve the best performance in swimming. Although most agree with these findings, there is disagreement in some studies, especially when it is difficult to define competitive level and age. The disagreement concerns three main aspects: 1 ) period of the studies and improvement of methodologies; 2 ) discrimination of methodologies between factors observed in numerical vs. experimental methods; 3 ) evidence that drag tends to be non-linear and depends on personal, technical, and stylistic factors. Based on the complexity of active drag, the study of this phenomenon must continue to improve swimming performance.

Exploring the impact of breathing patterns on active drag in breaststroke swimming

Variability of energy cost in breaststroke technique: a systematic review

Numerical and experimental methods used to evaluate active drag in swimming: A systematic narrative review

Measurement of the active drag coefficient in front-crawl: A stroke-by-stroke analysis

Understanding the Importance of Drag Coefficient Assessment for a Deeper Insight into the Hydrodynamic Profile of Swimmers

Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes

Understanding the Kinematic Profile of 2 Underwater Pullout Breaststroke Techniques

Propulsive forces in human competitive swimming: a systematic review on direct assessment methods

The Load-Velocity Slope Is an Indicator of the Active Drag in all Competitive Swimming Strokes

Propulsive Force of Upper Limbs and its Relationship to Swim Velocity in the Butterfly Stroke

A Biophysical Analysis on the Arm Stroke Efficiency in Front Crawl Swimming: Comparing Methods and Determining the Main Performance Predictors

The influence of the hand’s acceleration and the relative contribution of drag and lift forces in front crawl swimming

Effects of anthropometrics, thrust, and drag on stroke kinematics and 100 m performance of young swimmers using path‐analysis modeling

Bioimpedance Vector Patterns Changes in Response to Swimming Training: An Ecological Approach

A New Device for Estimating Active Drag in Swimming at Maximal Velocity

Upper limb kinematic differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl sprint swimming

5 km front crawl in pool and open water swimming: breath-by-breath energy expenditure and kinematic analysis

The influence of stroke mechanics into energy cost of elite swimmers

Differences in the rotational effect of buoyancy and trunk kinematics between front crawl and backstroke swimming

Predicting the intra-cyclic variation of the velocity of the centre of mass from segmental velocities in butterfly stroke: a pilot study

How Anthropometrics of Young and Adolescent Swimmers Influence Stroking Parameters and Performance? A Systematic Review