Abstract:Since the implement of Reform and Opening-up policy 40 years ago, Chinese researchers on foreign literatures have introduced and absorbed Western literary theories, critical approaches and research viewpoints abundantly, and have witnessed a rapid development in the Chinese foreign literature criticism, which makes possible the formation and enhancement of Chinese critical position, modes and theories in this field.The development trends of Chinese literary criticism in the New Era will be examined from three perspectives, namely, positions, orientations and methodologies.In terms of critical position, Chinese criticism is in a new stage of ″adhering to ourselves and benefiting for our own use″, which means that our criticism will follow the principles of ″Chinese mode of thinking″ and ″dialogue-innovation″.The former refers to an adherence to Chinese xiang (image) thinking pattern, which is characterized by an integral, correlative, complementary and dynamic thinking way based on the unity of nature and human beings and that of subject and object.The latter indicates an effort to unify China and the West, to be more specific, to blend Chinese holistic vision with Western rational analysis, and to fuse perception of soul with an analysis of things in order to interconnect aesthetic comprehension with rational cognition.In terms of the critical orientation, firstly we need to recognize that the difference between Western dominant epistemological criticism and Chinese dominant aesthetic criticism is that the former regards critical object as a ″thing″ to be analyzed rationally so as to deduce and verify general truth, in other words, it begins with a theoretical hypothesis, and its rational analysis leads to an ultimate verification or amendment of the hypothesis, the latter considers critical object as ″soul″ to be comprehended by the critic so that he may experience communication, resonance and insight in the literary work, in other words, it starts from the intersection of life perception between the critic and the literary works, and the critic's holistic vision of the work leads to the disclosure of insight into life and artistic beauty.Secondly, we shall grasp the sameness and the differences between Western marginalized aesthetic criticism and Chinese dominant aesthetic criticism.The sameness is that both define criticism as an aesthetic experience. And the difference is that Western aesthetic criticism emphasizes inner life exploration by means of imagination, judgement and learning, while Chinese aesthetic criticism stresses the disclosure of both insight into life and artistic form, which has established writing categories as Shensi (spirit and imagination), Xujing (emptiness and serenity), Miaowu (transcendental epiphany), Xushi (fiction and truth), formal categories as Qingzhi (emotion and thought), Wenzhi (expression and quality), Yixiang (significance and image), Yijing (sublime state of mind), Xingshen (form and spirit), and critical categories as Zhiyin (resonance and appreciation), Meichou (beauty and ugliness), Quwei (taste and interest), etc.In the new era, facing theory-oriented Western criticism and its constant construction and deconstruction trends, Chinese foreign literary criticism may advance Chinese aesthetic-oriented criticism through following Chinese poetic principles, such as ″the precondition of understanding is knowing the world and the people″, ″to perceive meaning through emotion and thought″ and ″Theory of Six Perspectives″.In terms of critical methodology, a thorough examination of the Western ingrained ″definition-analysis″ critical model reveals its method as follows:to take certain influential and generally accepted theory as reference, to regard conceptual definition as presupposed hypothesis, and to extract abstract concept through analyzing the text.Chinese foreign literary criticism follows the ″holistic approach″ of Chinese poetics, which comprehends literary works intuitively from subjective perspectives, and to seize the insight into the spirit of life based on the unification of the thing and the self.The current creative literary theories in China are mostly based on Chinese holistic approaches as follows:the modernization of Chinese poetics, the breakthrough of Western theories by means of Sino-Western theoretical dialogues, and extensive cosmopolitan, comparative and transnational critical approaches.

On Leung Ping-kwan's and Zhang Songjian's Research on Modernism Poetry of China in 1940s

On Modernity Problems of the Modern Chinese Poetics

General Survey on Chinese Modernism Poetry Tides of 20th Century

From Modernization to Modernity: Transition of Modern Chinese Literature Studies in the 20th Century

Breakthrough and Surpass——Liang Zongdai and Modernity of Modern Chinese Poetic Theory System

Modernism and Postmodernism in Chinese Literature

On Critical Position, Orientation and Methodology of Chinese Foreign Literature Criticism in the New Era

A critical Review of Researches into the Poetry of the Han,Wei and Six Dynasties in the First Half of the 20th Century

Another Exploration in Modern Chinese Literature--On the Literary Environment in the 1940s

Hermeneutics and the Modern Interpretation of Ancient Chinese Poetics

Traditional Chinese Poetry and Modern Chinese Literature

A Critical Reflection on and Construction of Modern Chinese Literary Theory

Creative Transformation of Chinese Traditional Literary Criticism——A Research on Zhu Guang-qian's On Poetics

The Historicity of Literary Genres and the Emergence of Modern Chinese Literary Criticism

On the Modern Poetry and the Needs of Today's Chinese Readers

Modern characteristics in modern Chinese literary theory

New Vision and New Practice of the Impact Studies of Comparative Poetics

On the Evolution of Wang Yuanhua's Methodology for Literary Theory

A study on the formation and its similarities and differences of modern Chinese and Japanese literary theory: Focusing on Wang Guowei’s literary discourse and Tsubouchi Shoyo’s literary theory

Contemporary Chinese Poetry and Russian Modernist and Postmodernist Poetry: Influence and Analogy

On the Construction of the Poetics Theory from the Perspective of Comparative Literature——Concurrently On the Uniqueness of Zhu Guangqian's On Poetics