Abstract:BACKGROUND: Some patients receiving defunctioning stomas will never undergo stoma reversal, but it is difficult to preoperatively predict which patients will be affected. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the risk factors associated with nonclosure of temporary stomas after sphincter-preserving low anterior resection for rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library databases for all of the studies analyzing risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas. STUDY SELECTION: We only included articles published in English in this meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) original article with extractable data, 2) studies including only defunctioning stomas created after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, 3) studies with nonclosure rather than delayed closure as the main end point, and 4) studies analyzing risk factors for nonclosure. INTERVENTION: Defunctioning stomas were created after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stoma nonclosure was the only end point, and it included nonclosure and permanent stoma creation after primary stoma closure. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodologic quality of the studies, and risk ratios and 95% CIs were used to assess risk factors. RESULTS: Ten studies with 8568 patients were included. The nonclosure rate was 19% (95% CI, 13%-24%; p < 0.001; I-2=96.2%). Three demographic factors were significantly associated with nonclosure: older age (risk ratio= 1.50 (95% CI, 1.12-2.02); p = 0.007; I-2= 39.3%), ASA score >2 (risk ratio = 1.66 (95% CI, 1.51-1.83); p < 0.001; I-2= 0%), and comorbidities (risk ratio = 1.58 (95% CI, 1.29-1.95); p < 0.001; I-2= 52.6%). Surgical complications (risk ratio = 1.89 (95% CI, 1.48-2.41); p < 0.001; I-2= 29.7%), postoperative anastomotic leakage (risk ratio = 3.39 (95% CI, 2.41-4.75); p < 0.001; I-2= 53.0%), stage IV tumor (risk ratio = 2.96 (95% CI, 1.73-5.09); p < 0.001; I-2= 88.1%), and local recurrence (risk ratio = 2.84 (95% CI, 2.11-3.83); p < 0.001; I-2= 6.8%) were strong clinical risk factors for nonclosure. Open surgery (risk ratio = 1.47 (95% CI, 1.01-2.15); p = 0.044; I-2= 63.6%) showed a borderline significant association with nonclosure. LIMITATIONS: Data on some risk factors could not be pooled because of the low number of studies. There was conspicuous heterogeneity between the included studies, so the pooled data were not absolutely free of exaggeration or influence. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, ASA score >2, comorbidities, open surgery, surgical complications, anastomotic leakage, stage IV tumor, and local recurrence are risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer, whereas tumor height, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are not. Patients with these risk factors should be informed preoperatively of the possibility of nonreversal, and joint decision-making is preferred.

Spontaneously Closed Protective Stoma : a Preliminary Report of Exploratory Study

Clinical Analysis of 9 Cases of a Novel Stent Assisted Intestinal Bypass for Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Assisted Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Safety of the Stent-Based Diverting Technique after Low Anterior Resection in Patients with Rectal Cancer

A Stent-Based Diverting Technique after Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Our Preliminary Experience.

Experimental Study of Primary Repair of Colonic Leakage with a Degradable Stent in a Porcine Model

Application of a Spontaneously Closed Protective Stoma in an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: a Preliminary Study.

[Study on the Application of Self-Fixing and Self-Detachable Drainage Stent in Pancreaticojejunostomy].

Pilot Study on Preventing Anastomotic Leakage in Stapled Gastroesophageal Anastomosis

Perpetuation of defunctioning stoma: risk factors and countermeasures

[Risk Factor Analysis on Postoperative Complications after Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision with Preventive Terminal Ileostomy and Timing of Stoma Closure in Rectal Cancer].

A Modified Spontaneously Closed Defunctioning Tube Ileostomy after Anterior Resection of the Rectum for Rectal Cancer with a Low Colorectal Anastomosis

Risk Factors for Nonclosure of a Temporary Defunctioning Ileostomy Following Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer.

Optimizing stoma closure: A laparoscopic technique yielding the least contamination

Purse-string versus linear closure of the skin wound following stoma reversal: A meta-analysis with RCT and systematic review

Risk Factors Associated With Nonclosure of Defunctioning Stomas After Sphincter-Preserving Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Protective loop ileostomy or colostomy? a risk evaluation of all common complications

Infectious Complications After Modified Purse-String Stoma Closure

Clinical application of a novel stent-assisted in situ intestinal bypass in preventing postoperative anastomotic leakage for low-mid rectal cancer: A retrospective study

Completely diverted tube ileostomy compared with loop ileostomy for protection of low colorectal anastomosis: a pilot study.

Risk Factors of Benign Stricture of Anastomotic Stoma after Esophagectomy and Therapeutic Effect of Stent Implantation

[Complications associated with closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection of rectal cancer].