Abstract:Several nurse researchers do not consistently engage the best rating scale design in developing health research questionnaires thus obscuring the obligatory psychometric properties of the tools as objective rating scales. In response, this paper intends to simplify the Rasch techniques of best rating scale (or questionnaire) validation into four stages. Among researchers and psychometricians, presenting the objective psychometric properties of questionnaires used as rating scales are the cornerstones of the mathematical credibility of any reading generated by the scale. On the contrary, being too reliant on the conventional methods called the classical test theory (CTT), most already “developed” questionnaires rarely display objective indices of the measuring tools. CTT is not the best method for designing questionnaires because its techniques rely on too many unproven mathematical assumptions. Correspondingly in this paper, the Rasch techniques of rating scale design are simplified into four steps for designing questionnaires as objective rating scales. A key contribution of Rasch validation technique is that essential psychometric properties are tested and displayed rather than merely assumed. Therefore, nurse researchers ought to show methodological and mathematical rigours aimed at designing questionnaires as objective measuring tools of health variables. Embracing the four phases of questionnaire design in Rasch techniques provides an easy-to-follow and scientifically robust framework for developing a questionnaire. Finally, the CTT approach to developing questionnaires lack evidence expected of an objective rating scale. Therefore, the four steps in Rasch techniques of questionnaire design, outlined here, present the techniques that researchers may engage in to minimise measurement errors.

A Rating Scale Analysis by Using the Modern Test Theory

Best Rating Scale Design Theory: Implications for Developing Questionnaires in Nursing and Health Sciences

A Comparison of EFL Raters' Essay-Rating Processes across Two Types of Rating Scales.

Psychometric benefits of self-chosen rating scales over given rating scales

Job Performance Structure and Its Variations with Different Raters

Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: application of the Rasch rating scale model

Effect of Interviewer's Weighting Strategies on Rating and Hiring

Statistical Analysis for Rating Scale in Clinical Trials

A Note on Evaluation of Polytomous Item Locations With the Rating Scale Model and Testing Its Fit

[Use of evaluation scales in psychopharmacology]

Establishing an Operational Model of Rating Scale Construction for English Writing Assessment

The Likert Scale Revisited

Comparing computer-based and paper-based rating modes in an English writing test

A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019

Evaluating a Brief Big Five Personality Test in a Diverse Chinese Sample: The Role of Midpoint Designs and Reversely-Worded Items

Effects of Assigning Raters to Items

How can applicants' reactions to scholastic aptitude tests be improved? A closer look at specific and general tests

Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.

The Effect of Rating Scale Design on Extreme Response Tendency in Consumer Product Ratings

An updated meta-analysis of the interrater reliability of supervisory performance ratings.