Influence of three strains of drosophila melanogaster's age on sevoflurance ED50 and vitality

Qi-quan YE,Ji-ze FENG,Jin LIU,Ning-jiang LI,Wei-ping CHENG,Zhuo-hua DAI,Cun-mei ZOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7295.2006.01.005
2006-01-01
Abstract:[Objective] To assess the influence of the age of three strains of fruit fly on sevoflurance ED_(50) and vitality.[Methods] According to the difference of age ranging from 1 to 8,10,12,15,18,22,26,30,34,38,and 42 days in turn,determine a series of flies' sevofluance ED_(50) in three groups divided into HYM3,F.PS1 and F.PR1.Every result was given at test with 7-dayold fly's sevafluance ED_(50) in each group.200 male fruit flies from each group were fed with 5 test tubes,and test cubes were renewed every 3 days,counting the number of survival.The data about vitality per group were computed by life table.The significance among these 3 groups was processed by ANOVA.[Results] Compared with the sevoflurance ED_(50) of 7-day-old flies by test,the data showed significant difference after 26 days old in HYM3 group,15 days old in F.PS1 group,and 22 days old in F.PR1 group.The sevoflurance ED_(50) decreased gradually as the age of flies increased.The ratios between the minimum ED_(50) and the 7-day-old ED_(50) in HYM3, F.PS1 and F.PR1 groups were 0.70,0.67,and 0.70.There was no significant difference in the vitality data of the three groups by life table.[Conclusion] The results suggested that the vitality data had no significant difference in the three groups.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?