[Clinical effects of percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail assisted by arthrography for the treatment of radial neck fractures in children]
Hui-Min Zhou,Yi-Wen Xu,Chun-Jie Tao,Jiang-Rong Fan,Jing-Yang You,Jia-Cheng Ruan,Si-Qi Shen,Zhen Wang,Yong Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230613
2024-09-25
Abstract:Objective: To explore clinical effect of closed reduction percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail assisted by arthrography in the treatment of radial neck fracture in children. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 children with radial neck fracture treated with arthrography assisted closed reduction and percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail internal fixation (arthrography with elastic nail group) from January 2019 to December 2022, including 12 males and 11 females, aged from 2 to 12 years old with an average of (7.36±1.89) years old;According to Judet fracture types, 14 children were type Ⅲ and 9 children were type Ⅳ. In addition, 23 children with radial neck fracture were selected from January 2015 to December 2018 who were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail fixation (elastic nail group), including 11 males and 12 females, aged from 2 to 14 years old with an average of (7.50±1.91) years old;Judet classification included 15 children were type Ⅲ and 8 children were type Ⅳ. Operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were compared between two groups. Metaizeau evaluation criteria was used to evaluate fracture reduction, and Tibone-Stoltz evaluation criteria was used to evaluate functional recovery of elbow between two groups. Results: Both groups were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of (16.56±6.34) months. Operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times of elastic nail group were (56.64±19.27) min and (21.13±7.87) times, while those of joint angiography with elastic nail group were (40.33±11.50) min and (12.10±3.52) times;there were difference between two groups (P<0.05). According to Metaizeau evaluation, 11 patients got excellent result, 9 good and 3 fair in joint angiography with elastic nail group, while in elastic nail group, 5 excellent, 13 good, 4 acceptable, and 1 poor;the difference between two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). According to Tibone-Stoltz criteria, 14 patients got excellent result, 8 good, and 1 fair in joint arthrography with elastic nail group;while in elastic nail group, 12 patients got excellent result, 9 good, 1 fair and 1 poor;there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared to percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail fixation, closed reduction assisted by arthrography has advantages of reduced operation time, decreased intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and improved fracture reduction. Arthrography enables clear visualization of the anatomical structures of radius, head, neck, bone, and cartilage in children, facilitating comprehensive display of fracture reduction and brachioradial joint alignment. This technique more precisely guides the depth of elastic intramedullary nail implantation in radius neck, thereby enhancing surgical efficiency and success rate.