Abstract:Two machine learning methods, K‐Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and Random Forest (RF), were employed to compare the disparities among commonly used open‐source digital elevation models (DEMs) in landslide susceptibility mapping. The study revealed significant differences among the DEMs, with the Copernicus DEM 30 m (referred to as COP) emerging as the most recommended option due to its superior rendering performance and stability. In this study, the application of open‐source digital elevation model (DEM) is explored for regional landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM), and the potential impact of different DEM choices on the mapping accuracy is also examined. With the advancements in remote sensing technology, an increasing number of global open‐source DEMs have been available, with improvement in the accuracy. However, the latest released data are rarely evaluated in LSM research. In this paper, DEM‐based factors, including elevation, aspect, slope, plan curvature and profile curvature, were generated from seven open‐source DEMs, including Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection (ASTER) V2, ASTERV3, ALOS World 3D‐30 m (AW3D30), Copernicus DEM 30 m (COP) Forest and Buildings removed Copernicus DEM (FABDEM), NASADEM, and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM). DEM‐based factors were coupled with the distance to road, distance to river, land use, lithology, rain and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The significant difference between DEMs is determined by comparing the area proportion. Slope, plane curvature and profile curvature are found to have a maximum difference of 15%–20%. Then, K‐Nearest Neighbours (KNN) and Random Forest (RF) were used to predict landslide susceptibility with two sampling methods, namely, 70% for training and 30% for testing (S1); 67% for training and 33% for testing (S2). For KNN with S1, the prediction rate is range from 0.8299 to 0.8701, with a difference of 0.0402. The difference of prediction rate is decreased to 0.0207 for S2 and 0.0258 for RF. COP has the highest prediction rate of 0.8701, 0.9254 and 0.9461 for KNN with S1 and RF with S1 and S2, respectively. ASTERV2 is the worst with prediction rate of 0.8897 and 0.8996 for KNN with S2 and RF with S1, respectively. The research result provides valuable insights for the selection of open‐source DEMs in future LSM.

Comparison of Light Detection and Ranging and National Elevation Dataset Digital Elevation Model on Floodplains of North Carolina

Comparisons of Three Types of DEMs: A Case Study of the Randleman Reservoir, North Carolina

An Efficient Method for Mapping Flood Extent in A Coastal Floodplain Using Landsat Tm and Dem Data

An e Y cient method for mapping ood extent in a coastal oodplain using Landsat TM and DEM data

Modeling flooding extent from Hurricane Floyd in the coastal plains of North Carolina

Mapping Extent of Floods: What We Have Learned and How We Can Do Better

Optimizing Height Above Nearest Drainage parameters to enable rapid flood mapping in North Carolina

Flood extent mapping during Hurricane Florence with repeat‐pass L‐band UAVSAR images

Comparison of Water Surface Detection Methods for Inundation Mapping from Sentienl-2 and Landsat-8: Zhengzhou Flood Case.

Using Landsat 7 TM Data Acquired Days after a Flood Event to Delineate the Maximum Flood Extent on a Coastal Floodplain

Effects of high-quality elevation data and explanatory variables on the accuracy of flood inundation mapping via Height Above Nearest Drainage

Enabling Quick, Accurate Crowdsourced Annotation for Elevation-Aware Flood Extent Mapping

Flood Extent Mapping based on High Resolution Aerial Imagery and DEM: A Hidden Markov Tree Approach

Comparison of the New Digital Flood Insurance Map (DFIRM) with the Existing FIRM, Wilson, North Carolina

Extracting Farmland Features From Lidar-Derived Dem For Improving Flood Plain Delineation

Vertical accuracy assessment of freely available global DEMs (FABDEM, Copernicus DEM, NASADEM, AW3D30 and SRTM) in flood-prone environments

A rapid high-resolution multi-sensory urban flood mapping framework via DEM upscaling

The Importance of Digital Elevation Model Selection in Flood Simulation and a Proposed Method to Reduce DEM Errors: A Case Study in Shanghai

Shoreline classification maps and ground truth data for the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina

Integration of remotely sensed inundation extent and high-precision topographic data for mapping inundation depth

Comparison of different open‐source Digital Elevation Models for landslide susceptibility mapping