[Efficacy and radiology evaluation of pulpotomy in mature permanent teeth]
Xiaoyi Zhao,Chang Liu,Kun Qian,Jie Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.021
2024-02-18
Abstract:Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of pulpotomy in patients of different ages and to explore the occurrence and characteristics of pulpal calcification. Methods: A total of 77 patients who underwent pulpotomy for mature permanent premolars and molars with caries-derived pulp exposure in the Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from October 2019 to August 2022 were selected. Pulpotomies were performed in a single visit using iRoot BP Plus bioceramic material as pulp capping agent. The patients were divided into three groups according to age: 25 cases in the adolescent group (11-20 years old) with a mean age of (15.88±2.19) years; 27 cases in the middle-aged group (21-50 years old) with a mean age of (34.59±8.67) years; and 25 cases in the elder-aged group (51-83 years old) with a mean age of (63.84±7.40) years. The patients were reviewed 1 year after the operation to evaluate the clinical efficacy and to record the formation of calcified bridge, thickness of calcified bridge, and pulp calcification index (PCI). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in terms of gender, dentition, and tooth position (P > 0.05). The 1-year postoperative follow-up rate was 85.71% (66/77), including 88.00% (22/25) in the adolescent group, 85.19% (23/27) in the middle-aged group, and 84.00% (21/25) in the elder-aged group. The 1-year follow-up clinical success rates of the three groups were 95.45% (21/22), 91.30% (21/23), and 95.24% (20/21), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). Among the clinical success cases, calcified bridges appeared in 12 cases (57.14%, 12/21) in the adolescent group, 8 cases (38.10%, 8/21) in the middle-aged group, and 3 cases (15.00%, 3/20) in the elder-aged group, with statistically significant differences (χ2= 7.810, P = 0.020 < 0.05). The difference was statistically significant (F = 4.434, P = 0.020 < 0.05) when comparing the thickness of calcified bridges among the three groups. Calcified bridge thickness was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.516, P < 0.05). The changes in pulpal calcification index ΔPCI were 0.67 ± 0.58, 0.43 ± 0.51, and 0.25 ± 0.52, respectively, with statistically significant differences among the three groups (F = 3.404, P = 0.040 < 0.05). Conclusion: Pulpotomy for caries-derived pulp exposure in elderly patients could also achieve a high success rate. The incidence of calcified bri-dges after pulpotomy and the acceleration of pulpal calcification were age-related. The adolescent group was more likely to form calcified bridges and also showed more pronounced accelerated root canal calcification.