Relationship between quality of school life and life satisfaction in junior high school students
Wang Liu,Li-li Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.02.021
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To investigate the present status of quality of school life and its relationship with life satisfaction in junior high school students. METHODS: Totally 431 junior high school students were measured with Quality of School Life Scale (QSLS) and Brief Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (BMSLSS) by means of hierarchical sampling in November 2004. ① The QSLS was composed of 45 items, and included seven subscales of general satisfaction, negative affect, teachers, social integration, achievement, opportunity and status. The response key for each item was a four-point Likert scale and student responses were scored from 1 for strongly disagree to 4 for strongly agree. The higher scores represented higher quality of school life except the subscale of negative affect. ② The BMSLSS was composed of 5 items which represented family, friend, school, living environment and self respectively. Response options were derived from the widely utilized delighted-terrible scale. They included 1 terrible, 2 unhappy, 3 mostly dissatisfied, 4 mixed (about equally satisfied and dissatisfied), 5 mostly satisfied, 6 pleasure and 7 delighted. The mean of all the items' total scores denoted the score of life satisfaction. The data collection was conducted by the method of group test. Students' demographic information was collected in the questionnaires at the same time. The academic achievement refer to the grade level whose student's self perception to his/her achievement in his/her class, namely, the students were asked to choose the grade level which was consistent or adjacent with his/her achievement from crackajack, middling and third-rate.RESULTS: Totally 450 questionnaires were provided, 431 were effective, and the rate of respond was 95.8%. ① The junior high students had higher evaluation on their quality of school life. ② The students in grade 1 got higher scores than students in grade 3 on the dimensions of general satisfaction, teachers and opportunity. ③ With improved study achievements, the students had higher quality of school life on the dimensions of general satisfaction, teachers, social integration, achievement and opportunity. With improved study achievements, the students had less negative affect. ④ There was significant negative correlation between negative affect and life satisfaction, the correlative coefficient was -0.45. Other dimensions of quality of school life such as general satisfaction, teachers, social integration, achievement, opportunity and status correlated with life satisfaction significantly, the coefficients were 0.62, 0.57, 0.63, 0.61, 0.63, 0.61 and 0.59 respectively, P all < 0.01. ⑤ Total variance of life satisfaction explained by all the dimensions of quality of school life was 61%. CONCLUSION: The students had higher evaluation on their quality of school life. The quality of school life was an important predictive indicator of life satisfaction.