Psychological intervention based on social cognitive theory: Treating pain, anxiety, and depression in perioperative patients
Hai-Jian Mao,Lin-Fei Wang,Chun Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i8.1199
2024-08-19
Abstract:Background: Surgery is an effective method for treating certain diseases. Factors such as disease, preoperative fear and tension, surgical stress, postoperative pain, and related complications directly affect the smooth progression and outcome of surgery. Patients may experience a series of psychological and physiological changes during the perioperative period, resulting in anxiety and depression, which may reduce the pain threshold and worsen their prognosis. Aim: To investigate the effects of a psychological intervention among perioperative patients, based on social cognitive theory (SCT). Methods: We enrolled 200 patients who underwent surgical care at The First People's Hospital of Lin'an District, Hangzhou between January and December 2023. They were categorized into a routine intervention group (n = 103) and a psychological intervention group (n = 97), based on the intervention strategies used. Various assessment tools, including the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), the self-rating depression scale (SDS), and the Connor-Davidson Resilience scale, were used to measure patients' negative states and emotions. The pre- and post-intervention scores for these metrics in the two groups were then analyzed. Results: In the psychological intervention group, the SAS and SDS scores (31.56 ± 5.18 and 31.46 ± 4.57, respectively) were significantly reduced compared to the routine intervention group (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale pain scores at 12 and 24 hours after intervention (6.85 ± 1.21, 4.24 ± 0.72) were notably higher than those in the routine intervention group (P < 0.05). The psychological intervention group also demonstrated superior scores in perseverance (36.08 ± 3.29), self-reliance (22.63 ± 2.91), optimism (11.42 ± 1.98), and resilience (70.13 ± 5.37), compared to the routine intervention group (P < 0.05). Additionally, the psychological intervention group's confrontation score (23.16 ± 4.29) was higher (P < 0.05). This group also reported lower scores in avoidance (9.28 ± 1.94) and yielding (6.19 ± 1.92) (P < 0.05). Lastly, the Short Form 36 Health Survey scores were significantly higher in the psychological intervention group, indicating a better quality of life (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Psychological intervention measures based on SCT can effectively alleviate pain, anxiety, and depression in perioperative patients.