Clinical observation of raltitrexed combination with irinotecan versus FOLFIRI regimen as second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer

Dacheng XIE,Ning LI,Jingjue WANG,Weihua JIANG,Liwei WAGN,Fei ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-0460.2013.02.011
2013-01-01
Chinese Clinical Oncology
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between biweekly raltitrexed and irinotecan with FOLFIRI for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods A total of 50 patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were included into the study.There were 25 patients for irinotecan plus raltitrexed regimen group(treatment group: raltitrexed 2.5mg/m2 iv d1,irinotecan 180mg/m2 iv d1) and 25 patients for FOLFIRI group(control group: irinotecan 180mg/m2 iv d1,leucovorin 400mg/m2 iv d1,fluorouracil 400mg/m2 iv d1,fluorouracil 2400mg/m2 iv 46-48 h).Both two regimens were 14 days as a cycle,and a total of 12 cycles was applied unless there was evidence of disease progression or intolerance of treatment.The efficacy was evaluated every 3-cycle chemotherapy and side effects were evaluated every cycle.Results Patients in treatment group received 1 CR,4 PR,18 SD,2 PD;and in control group were 2 PR,19 SD,4 PD.No statistical difference was found between two groups in regard to response rate(20% vs.8%) and disease control rate(92% vs.84%).Raltitrexed and irinotecan regimen had higher frequency of grade 1-2 transaminase increase(24% vs.4%,P<0.05),while FOLFIRIF regimen had higher frequency of grade 1-2 neutropenia(48% vs.20%,P<0.05) and mucositis(32% vs.8%,P<0.05).Conclusion Raltitrexed and irinotican regimen is effective for metastatic colorectal cancer.It has lower toxicity compared with FOLFIRI regimen.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?