Abstract:Equitable and efficient allocation of pollutant discharge permits is vital for controlling total pollutant amounts. However, the conventional water pollutant discharge permit allocation method is criticized for dividing the environmental attributes of water bodies, which is mainly based on administrative units. China is establishing a water ecological environment zoning management system to manage the water environment more scientifically, which may have a great impact on for controlling total pollutant amounts. Whether the ecological environment zoning management system can promote more equitable and efficient permit allocation remains unknown. In this paper, an environmental zoning system and “basin-region” correlation are established to take both regional and watershed allocation processes into consideration. Then, a multi-index Gini coefficient method is established to evaluate the equality of different allocating methods. The Gini coefficient is then combined with a linear interactive and general optimizer method to achieve an equitable allocation of ammonia nitrogen discharge permits in the Songhua River Basin from both watershed and regional perspectives. Forty-five water pollutant discharge allocation scenarios are considered to represent different manager tendencies. The results show that allocation based on watershed functional units is more equitable than that based on administrative units. The index weighting settings also have a large impact on regional and total equality and environmental efficiency. Midstream and downstream areas show large allocation differences, although no scenario can satisfy all watershed regions in terms of equality and environmental efficiency at the same time. Thus, more trade-offs are needed during decision making. By considering the coordination of social, environmental and economic development at the basin level, this study provides new insight into equitable and efficient allocation. Moreover, the findings suggest that an environmental zoning system should be considered for discharge permit allocation in water resource management.

Comparative Study of China-US Wastewater Project Bonds Financing Structure

How to Allocate Discharge Permits More Fairly in China?-A New Perspective from Watershed and Regional Allocation Comparison on Socio-Natural Equality

Comparing China's Financial System

Comparison of Water Resources Management Between China and the United States

China’s Green Bond Market: Structural Characteristics, Formation Factors, and Development Suggestions—Based on the Comparison of the Chinese and the US Green Bond Markets Structure

Comparative Study of Construction Project Letters of Guarantee in P. R. China and the United States

The Study on the Financing Policy and Corporate Governance of the Environmental Protection and Mechanical Enterprises in China

Characteristic Analysis of Financing Gap for Urban Wastewater Infrastructure Construction in China

Which is more cost-effective? A comparison of two wastewater treatment models in China–Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park, China

A Comparative Study of the Performance of Public Water Rights Allocation in China

Research on the Financing Operation Mode of Chinese Sewage Treatment Plant

A comparative analysis of green building rating systems in China and the United States

Investigating the financialization of water infrastructure in China: a public policy perspective

Risk Assessment of China’s Water-Saving Contract Projects

Proposes on Utilization and Management of Reclaimed Wastewater in China

Comparisons of urban water conservation and wastewater reclamation versus long distance water transfer

Analysis on Fund-investing and Fund-raising Mechanism in Urban Sewage Treatment at Present Stage in China

A review of typical water pollution control and cost-benefit analysis in China

Marginal Opportunity Cost Pricing for Wastewater Disposal : a Case Study of Wuxi, China

Fresh water management in New Zealand and China: similarities in different institutional frameworks

Standard System Comparison of Government Investment Projects among China, the United States and Canada