Experimental study on protection effect of lungischemic preconditioning for lung and myocardiuin canine cardio pulmonary bypass

WANG Xian-bo,XIANG Xiao-yong,ZHAO Xing-ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5301.2007.05.019
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To explore the protection effect and mechanism of lung ischemic preconditioning on lung and myocardium in canine cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB). Methods 12 adult mongrel canines(12-15 kg) were randomly divided into two groups, 6 for control group(group C), in which the CPB was established by abdominal aorta and right atrium cannulation, experimental group was treated with ischemic preconditioning, in which left lung hilus were clamped for two cycles of five minutes followed five minutes released before cross-clamping of the aorta in six canines(croup IP). The technique of myocardium protection and cardiac arrest was the same in both groups(cold crystalline cardioplegia). CPB was controlled running for 1 hour in both groups. The lung and myocardial tissue were sampled at the time of pre- CPB and 120 minutes after reperfusion to test the wet/dry ratio of lung tissue and myocardial water content(MWC), maleic dialdehyde(MDA )and superoxid dismutase(SOD) of both tissue. Lung and myocardial biopsies were obtained before and after CPB in both groups for microscope pathological examination. Results ⑴After reperfusion, the wet/dry ratio of lung tissue in group IP was significantly lower than that in group C(3.4867±0.6776 vs 5.3067±0.3034,P<0.05). The MDA of lung tissue in group IP was significantly lower than that in group C[(5.3517±1.0769)nmol/mgprot vs (7.4002±1.1569)nmol/mgprot,P<0.05). SOD activity of lung tissue in group IP was significantly higher than group C[(127.4512±18.88)U/mgprot vs (103.6103±9.5299)U/mgprot,P<0.05). ⑵After reperfusion, the MWC of myocardium in group IP was significantly lower than that in group C(64.6173±4.1682 vs 77.3333±3.0807,P<0.05). The MDA of myocardium in group IP was significantly lower than that in group C[(5.3233±1.5304)nmol/mgprot vs(7.5517±1.0236)nmol/mgprot,P<0.05);SOD activity of myocardium in group IP was significantly higher than group C [(166.0104±6.3458)U/mgprotvs(140.4514±13.9413)U/mgprot,P<0.05). ⑶ pathological examination of lung and myocardial tissue revealed that in control group there were more obvious intraalveolar hemorrhage, leukocyte adherence and interstitial edema compared with group IP. Conclusion The study indicates that lung ischemic preconditioning may have protective effect on lung and myocardium after CPB. The possible mechanism was that ischemic preconditioning reduced the production of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?