Relationship between serum VEGF, CA125, CEA, and CYFRA21-1 levels in non-small cell lung cancer patients and the clinical significance
Xiaoping Qian,Baorui Liu,Xinzi Liu,WenJing Hu,Lifeng Wang,Yang Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2009.02.009
2009-01-01
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:时测定血清中CA125、CEA、Cyfra21-1的滴度及其相关性。方法:采用抗人VEGF单克隆抗体、夹心ELISA法测定78 例NSCLC患者血清VEGF浓度。同时利用放射免疫法检测血清中CEA、CA125、Cyfra21-1的浓度。结果:NSCLC有 远处转移组血清VEGF、CA125、CEA浓度显著高于无远处转移组(P<0.05);有淋巴结转移组血清VEGF显著高于无 淋巴结转移组(P<0.05)。血清VEGF和CA125、CEA在Ⅲ+Ⅳ期NSCLC的表达显著高于I+II期NSCLC(P<0.05)。血 清CEA在腺癌中显著增高(P<0.05)。血清VEGF、CA125阴性组的化疗有效率(35.3%、35.7%)显著高于阳性组 (7.7%、15.8%) (P=0.004,0.006)。化疗前血清CEA阴性者的中位总生存时间(mOS)较阳性者明显延长(分别为36 个月,20个月;P=0.04);而血清VEGF、Cyfra21-1、CA125浓度对mOS无明显影响(P值分别为0.07,0.099,0.19)。血 清CEA、VEGF、Cyfra21-1、CA125表达对中位无瘤生存期(mTTP)均无明显影响(P值分别为0.119,0.280,0.146, 0.230)。NSCLC患者血清VEGF与CEA表达存在显著正相关(P<0.05),其他肿瘤标志物之间无显著相关性(P> 0.05)。结论:综合检测NSCLC患者化疗前血清肿瘤标志物可能有利于协助诊断、预测转移、评价化疗疗效及判断 预后。 sults: Serum levels of VEGF, CA125 and CEA were significantly higher in NSCLC patients with lymph node metastasis or other distant metastasis than in those without lymph node metastasis or other distant metasta- sis (P<0.05). Serum levels of VEGF, CEA and CA125 were significantly higher in stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ NSCLC pa- tients than in stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ NSCLC patients (P<0.05). Serum CEA levels were higher in patients with ade- nocarcinoma than in patients with other malignancies (P<0.05). The chemotherapy response rate of NSCLC patients without VEGF or CEA expression was higher than that of those with VEGF (35.3% vs. 7.7%, P= 0.004) or CEA (35.7% vs. 15.8%, P=0.006) expression. The mean overall survival of CEA negative NSCLC patients was longer than those with CEA expression (36 m vs. 20 m, P=0.04). Serum levels of VEGF (P= 0.07), Cyfra21-1 (P=0.099), and CA125 (P=0.19) were not correlated with overall survival. Serum levels of CEA (P=0.119), VEGF (P=0.280), Cyfra21-1 (P=0.146) and CA125 (P=0.230) were not correlated with mean time to progression of NSCLC. A positive correlation was observed between serum VEGF level and serum CEA level. No correlation was found among serum levels of CA125, Cyfra21-1 and VEGF. Conclusion: The