Abstract:Background The development of clean or novel alternative energy has become a global trend that will shape the future of energy. In the present study, 3 microbial strains with different oxygen requirements, including Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047 and Kluyveromyces marxianus 15D, were used to construct a hydrogen production system that was composed of a mixed aerobic-facultative anaerobic-anaerobic consortium. The effects of metal ions, organic acids and carbohydrate substrates on this system were analyzed and compared using electrochemical and kinetic assays. It was then tested using small-scale experiments to evaluate its ability to convert starch in 5 L of organic wastewater into hydrogen. For the one-step biohydrogen production experiment, H1 medium (nutrient broth and potato dextrose broth) was mixed directly with GAM broth to generate H2 medium (H1 medium and GAM broth). Finally, Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047 and Kluyveromyces marxianus 15D of three species microbial co-culture to produce hydrogen under anaerobic conditions. For the two-step biohydrogen production experiment, the H1 medium, after cultured the microbial strains Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047 and Kluyveromyces marxianus 15D, was centrifuged to remove the microbial cells and then mixed with GAM broth (H2 medium). Afterward, the bacterial strain Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 was inoculated into the H2 medium to produce hydrogen by anaerobic fermentation. Results The experimental results demonstrated that the optimum conditions for the small-scale fermentative hydrogen production system were at pH 7.0, 35°C, a mixed medium, including H1 medium and H2 medium with 0.50 mol/L ferrous chloride, 0.50 mol/L magnesium sulfate, 0.50 mol/L potassium chloride, 1% w/v citric acid, 5% w/v fructose and 5% w/v glucose. The overall hydrogen production efficiency in the shake flask fermentation group was 33.7 mL/h -1 .L -1 , and those the two-step and the one-step processes of the small-scale fermentative hydrogen production system were 41.2 mL/h -1 .L -1 and 35.1 mL/h -1 .L -1 , respectively. Conclusion Therefore, the results indicate that the hydrogen production efficiency of the two-step process is higher than that of the one-step process.

Biohydrogen production from purified terephthalic acid (PTA) processing wastewater by anaerobic fermentation using mixed microbial communities

Thermophilic Hydrogen Production from Starch Wastewater Using Two-Phase Sequencing Batch Fermentation Coupled with UASB Methanogenic Effluent Recycling

Biohydrogen Production From Traditional Chinese Medicine Wastewater In Anaerobic Packed Bed Reactor System

Fermentative Hydrogen Production from Beet Sugar Factory Wastewater Treatment in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor Using Anaerobic Mixed Consortia

Enhanced Thermophilic Hydrogen Production by an Enriched Novel Acetic-Acid-Type Fermentative Bacterium from Inoculum Sludge with Nonheat Pretreatment

The Hydrogen Production of Mixed Acid Fermentation in Bio-Hydrogen Producing Reactor

Long-term performance, membrane fouling behaviors and microbial community in a hollow fiber anaerobic membrane bioreactor (HF-AnMBR) treating synthetic terephthalic acid-containing wastewater

Metabolic Pathways of Hydrogen Production in Fermentative Acidogenic Microflora

Hydrogen Production from Rice Winery Wastewater in an Upflow Anaerobic Reactor by Using Mixed Anaerobic Cultures

Biohydrogen production and wastewater treatment from organic wastewater by anaerobic fermentation with UASB

Peracetic acid promotes biohydrogen production from anaerobic dark fermentation of waste activated sludge

Fermentative Hydrogen Production from Soybean Protein Processing Wastewater in an Anaerobic Baffled Reactor (ABR) Using Anaerobic Mixed Consortia.

Enhanced Hydrogen Production in Microbial Electrolysis Through Strategies of Carbon Recovery from Alkaline/thermal Treated Sludge

Feasibility of Biohydrogen Production from Industrial Wastes Using Defined Microbial Co-Culture

Hydrogen Production Rates of Three Typical Anaerobic Acidogenic Fermentations from Organic Wastewater

Effective hydrogen production using waste sludge and its filtrate

Biohydrogen Production by Anaerobic Fermentation from Manure Wastewater

Hydrogen production from herbal wastewater via anaerobic fermentation with diatomite‐immobilized sludge

Hydrogen bio-production through anaerobic microorganism fermentation using kitchen wastes as substrate

Biohydrogen and polyhydroxyalkanoate production from original hydrolyzed polyacrylamide-containing wastewater

Arousing the Bioelectroactivity and Syntrophic Metabolic Functionality of Microorganisms in a Recirculated Two-Phase Anaerobic Digestion Bioreactor for Enhanced Biohythane Recovery from High-Solids Biowaste