On some basic problems related to the genetic classification and mineralization of granites: A discussion with Mr. Zhang Qi

RenMin HUA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16111/j.0258-7106.2011.01.003
2011-01-01
Abstract:As regards some important viewpoints on the genetic classification and related mineralization of granites from the paper "Relationship between granitic rocks and Au-Cu-W-Sn mineralization" written by Zhang Qi et al.(called "Zhang's paper" for short)in Mineral Deposits,the present author raises several doubts and questions for discussion.The classification put forward by "Zhang's paper" has three problems,i.e.,1,adakite as a special type of granitic rocks cannot be employed as one of the genetic types of granitoids;2,Sr and Yb concentrations of granites do not have definite property as an indicator of genetic classification of granites;3,the names of granite types such as Himalaya,Zhe-Min,and Nanling used by "Zhang's paper" cannot well represent and incorporate all granites in these areas.It is pointed out that both W-Sn and Cu-Au deposits related to granitic rocks are mainly of hydrothermal geneses,and hence have close genetic relations with granitic rocks.Temporally the mineralization was generally simultaneous to or later than the rock-forming epoch,but could not be earlier than the granite.Many examples are put forward to prove that W-Sn and Cu-Au can co-exist in the same mineral deposit,which,however,was denied by "Zhang's paper".The present paper also criticizes other points of view held by "Zhang's paper",such as "ore-fluid and magma having respective ascending paths" and so-called "initial source of gold".
What problem does this paper attempt to address?