Abstract:Modern aircraft is a man-machine-cooperate complex system. The issues which affect the aviation safety gradually become human factors. Statistical reports show that more than 70% of the civil aircraft accidents are caused by human because of the misuse, abuse and disuse of the automatic systems. Several studies have been made, trying to reveal the reasons of human induced safety issues. Many of them consider workload as a main reason. Studies show that too high or too low of workload would both have higher probability of human errors. The state of art workload measurement techniques are generally organized into three broad categories: subjective rating scales, task performance measures and psychophysiological measures. There are some disadvantages in the conventional workload measuring techniques. Subjective rating scales couldn’t provide continuous evaluation in the flight task and the results could be affected by participants’ emotion and performance etc. The performance measures overlook the operator’s initiatives and effort. The mechanisms of the physiological reactions are complex, and the physiological measures could be easily contaminated by environmental changes such as illumination, pressure and vibration. We proposed a method to evaluate the human factors in a flight task based on multiple objective measures. In the presented method, the objective measures include the pilot’s eye activities, control activities, cardio-respiratory reactions and the flight status parameters. Principal component analysis was applied to integrate the above objective measures into four meaningful aspects. Meanwhile, in order to link the cockpit components (e.g. the displays and the control equipment) to the pilot and the flight performance, four correlation aspects were also considered which include the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the pilot’s arousal, the correlation between the pilot’s cognitive activity and the flight performance and the correlation between the pilot’s control activity and the flight performance. These correlation aspects could provide diagnostic information in the assessment of the design of the cockpit components. We also constructed an eight-dimension pattern to integrate the above eight aspects and achieved an intuitive and continuous evaluation of the inflight human factors in the flight deck.

Design of physical sign data collection system for human factors in civil airplane cockpit

Multidimensional Cockpit Ergonomics Evaluation System

Design Standards And Layout Methods Of Multi-Information Visual Interface Based On Eye Movement Of Flight Simulator

Research of Data Analytic System of Physiological Parameters Detecting Device for Pilots

Analysis of Human Factors in Typical Accident Tests of Certain Type Flight Simulator

The System Design of Avionics Coordinated Test Based on Dual-arm Cooperative Robot

The Comprehensive Evaluation Method of the Human Factors in the Flight Deck Based on the Physical and Behaviour Measurements

Human-computer interaction interface design of flight simulator based on situation awareness

Design of Portable Testing Equipment for Flight Data Recording System

Research on Design Method of Human-in-the-loop Civil Aircraft Simulation System

Design of Atmosphere Data System of a Plane

A Sensor System of Seat Sensor Network for Adaptive Aircraft Passenger Seat System

Smart Cockpit Layout Design Framework Based on Human-Machine Experience

Design of Indoor Lighting Control System for Human Body Signal Acquisition Based on Internet of Things

A Civil Aircraft Cockpit Control Device Design Using Mixed Reality Device

Interface Design of Semantic System for Road Sign Management

Current study on interaction design in automotive intelligent cockpit

A Sensing Chair Design For Home Based Physiological Signs Monitoring

User-centered framework for assessing the performance of smart car cockpits

Using NASA-TLX to evaluate the flight deck design in Design Phase of Aircraft

User Centered Design (VII): From Automated Flight Deck to Intelligent Flight Deck