Abstract:BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common digestive tract tumors. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed early postoperative clinical data of 48 patients with colorectal cancer treated in our hospital between 2015 and 2021, of which 21 underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery, and 27 underwent laparotomy. There was no significant difference in clinical data. Patients were included if they had colorectal cancer (confirmed by colonoscopy and biopsy pathological examination before surgery), were evaluated for possible radical surgery before surgery, and had no intestinal obstruction, tumor invasion of adjacent organs (by digital rectal examination and preoperative abdominal color Doppler ultrasound, CT confirmed) and no other history of abdominal surgery. Using the method of clinical control study, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative general condition, surgical lymph node removal (postoperative pathology), surgical complications, gastrointestinal function recovery, surgical before and after blood glucose, body temperature, white blood cells, pain visual analog scale (VAS) and other conditions were compared and analyzed to determine feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer was successfully removed by laparoscopic radical resection without any significant problems or surgical fatalities. Age, gender, tumor location, stage, and duration of surgery did not differ between laparoscopic and laparotomy operations. Compared to laparotomy, postoperative eating, bowel movements, and blood sugar levels improved. Variations in the length of surgically removed specimens after VAS measurements revealed open and laparoscopic operations. The overall lymph node count was 10.8 ± 1.6, with no variation between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery is safe and feasible. Also, it has the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Laparoscopic colorectal cancer radical surgery can comply with the principles of oncology revolutionary.

To analyze the methods of manipulation using in radical operation of rectal carcinoma under the laparoscope

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Comparative study of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colon Cancer

Analysis on laparoscopic assistant operation for 51 cases with rectal cancer

Influence of Different Treatment Methods of Left Colic Artery on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Clinical Comparison of Short-Term Treatment Outcomes in Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection of Rectal Carcinoma

Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer

Analysis on 98 Cases with Low Rectal Cancer by Laparoscopic Sphincter-Preserving Radical Surgery

Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal carcinoma

Clinical Research of Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer by Pull-Through Operation Without Assistant Incision

Evaluation of Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer

Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic Surgery in Radical Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Anatomical Characteristics of the Rectal Cancers for Laparoscopic Radical Operation

Control Study on the Effect of Laparoscopic Operation and Patefaction Operation for Rectal Cancer

Analysis of Curative Effect of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery and Open Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

[Laparoscopic-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy in Treatment of Invasive Gastric Cancer: Analysis of 47 Cases].

Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Analysis of effect of colonoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of colorectal tumors

Clinical Evaluation of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Cancer of the Low Rectum

Laparoscopic Vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China