The short term outcome of Bryan artificial disc replacement and some related issues

Zhang Fengshan
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To review the clinical outcome of Bryan artificial disc replacement in the treatment of cervical disc disorders(CDD),and investigate the cause of some technical problems and their possible solutions.Method:121 cases of CDD with 145 Bryan disc replacement including 99 cases of single-level,20 cases of double-level and 2 cases of three-level were reviewed.JOA 17 score scale was used for the neurological assessment of pre-operation and final follow up.The lateral view X-rays of the cervical spine at final follow up were evaluated for the difference of AP diameter between implant and vertebral body(VB),the position of superior and inferior implant endplate,and the axis of implant and original disc space.The motion of implant and heterotopic ossification around the implants were recorded on the flexion and extension lateral view X-rays.Result:All cases obtained the follow-up with an average of 18 months(range 12 to 24 months).The pre-operative JOA score was 8.5 and post-operative one was 15.5 on an average in the cases of spondylotic myelopathy.All symptoms disappeared in the cases of radiculopathy.There was no subsidence of implant and worsening of pre-operative symptoms.42 disc implants(28.97%) had smaller size than the endplate of VB.23 artificial discs(15.86%) had their superior and inferior implant endplate too close each other at either anterior or posterior edge when the neck was in neutral position,which resulted in the limited flexion and extension of implanted segment.32 implants(22.07%) had their implant axis rotated superiorly or inferiorly.4 discs of 3 cases(2.76%) had spontaneous fusion happened within 12 months after operation.Two cases fused at anterior edge of VB and one at the posterior edge.Conclusion:The Bryan cervical disc replacement for the treatment of cervical disc disorders(CDD) has offered an excellent short term clinical outcome.This technique does require certain learning curve.Some related issues need to be addressed to shorten the learning curve.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?