Immune Responses of M-Csf-r Dna Vaccine and Its Effects on Hematopoiesis in Mice

Y Wang,KF Wu,Q Rao,YM Lin,GG Zheng,DX Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00186-7
IF: 3.249
2000-01-01
Experimental Hematology
Abstract:It has been well established that vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding a specific gene can elicit protective immune responses to a variety of infectious diseases as well as certain cancer. Our previous works demonstrated that macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (M-CSF-R, the product of c-fms proto-oncogene) was highly expressed in many malignancies (Wu et al. Hematologica 1999, 84:951). The purpose of our current study is to investigate the immunogenecity of M-CSF-R DNA vaccine and its effects on hematopoiesis. M-CSF-R DNA vaccine was constructed by inserting a cDNA fragment encoding the extracellular domains of M-CSF-R into a mammalian expressing plasmid pcDNA3, which was designated as pcDNA/R, and its blank vector (pcDNA3 without inserting foreign DNA fragment) was applied as a blank control. Mice were injected with 100μg of purified pcDNA/R i.m. weekly for 3 times, and antibodies titer were detected by ELISA. Compared to immunization with recombinant human M-CSF-R (rhM-CSF-R), pcDNA/R immunization induced weak antibody responses to M-CSF-R. The cellular immune responses were measured by lymphoblast transformation assay, and the stimulation index (SI) for pcDNA/R immunization was 3.2±0.6, whereas immunization with rhM-CSF-R exhibited less strong cell-mediated immune responses (SI=2.4±0.7). As M-CSF and its receptor are essential for the development of monocyte, hematological examinations of the immunized mice were undertaken in this report. The peripheral blood leukocyte count and the proportion of lymphocyte elevated markedly in mice injected with either pcDNA/R or rhM-CSF-R, whose WBC count (×106/mL) were 11.5±1.8 and 16.4±5.4 respectively, compared to 7.9±2.4 of those injected with normal saline (NS) and 9.4±1.4 of that with blank vector. CFU-GM assay discovered no significant differences among mice injected with either NS, pcDNA/R or rhM-CSF-R, however, a 46% increase of CFU-GM was observed in mice injected with blank vector, suggesting that plasmid DNA may promote the proliferation of CFU-GM in vivo. Physical examination and histopathological examinations revealed no abnormalities associated with M-CSF-R DNA immunization. Our data indicate that M-CSF-R DNA vaccine can effectively induce specific humoral and cellular immune responses to rhM-CSF-R, and has no severe adverse effects on the hematopoiesis of immunized mice, which suggests that M-CSF-R DNA vaccination may have an important implication for the immunotherapy of malignancies highly expressing M-CSF-R.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?