Ceramide Does Not Act As a General Second Messenger for Ultraviolet-Induced Apoptosis

Jiong Deng,Haifan Zhang,Freke Kloosterboer,Yong Liao,Jim Klostergaard,Mark L Levitt,Mien-Chie Hung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204900
IF: 8.756
2002-01-01
Oncogene
Abstract:Ceramide has been proposed as a second messenger for stress-induced apoptosis. By characterization of murine melanoma cells and their E1A transfectants, we found several lines of evidences against the role of ceramide as a second messenger for ultraviolet (UV)-induced apoptosis. First, although E1A transfected melanoma cells were more sensitive to UV-induced apoptosis than parental cells, the relative endogenous ceramide elevation induced by UV was greater in parental cells than in E1A transfectants. Second, UV-resistant melanoma cells were more sensitive to exogenous ceramide than UV-sensitive E1A transfectants. The differential responses to UV and ceramide by E1A require the same functional CR2 domain of E1A. Third, unlike the action of UV, transient exposure (up to 2 h) of lethal dose of ceramide was not sufficient to cause apoptosis in these cells, and persistent presence of ceramide was required for processing the apoptotic process. Finally, ceramide and UV do not share a common pathway in apoptosis induction. UV-induced apoptosis was blocked by interleukin-1β-converting enzyme (ICE) inhibitor z-VAD whereas ceramide-induced apoptosis was not. Therefore, we conclude that ceramide is not a general second messenger for UV-induced apoptosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?