Protective Effects of Intermedin/Adrenomedullin2 on Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Isolated Rat Hearts

JH Yang,YF Qi,YX Jia,CS Pan,J Zhao,J Yang,JK Chang,CS Tang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2004.10.025
IF: 3.867
2005-01-01
Peptides
Abstract:Intermedin (IMD) is a novel member of the calcitonin/calcitonin gene-related peptide (CT/CGRP) family identified from human and other vertebrate tissues. Preprointermedin can generate a 47-amino acid mature peptide (IMD1–47) and a shorter 40-amino acid one (IMD8–47) by proteolytic cleavage. The present study was designed to determine the protective effect of IMD on cardiac ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury and its possible mechanism. Isolated rat hearts were perfused on a Langendorff apparatus and subjected to 45-min global ischemia and 30-min reperfusion. Cardiac function was measured. The release of myocardial protein and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the formation of malondialdehyde (MDA) were assayed. Myocardial cAMP content was determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Cardiac I/R induced a marked inhibition of cardiac function and myocardial injury. Reperfusion with IMD significantly attenuated the I/R injury. Compared with I/R alone, perfusion with 10−8mol/L IMD1–47 and IMD8–47 induced a 36% and 33% increase in Δ left ventricular pressure (ΔLVP), 30% and 28% in maximal rate of increase of LV pressure (+LVdP/dt max), and 34% and 31% in maximal rate of decrease of LV pressure (−LVdP/dt max), respectively (all P<0.01) but an approximately 58% and 51% decrease in LV diastolic pressure, respectively (P<0.01). In addition, perfusion with IMD markedly attenuated the leakage of LDH, total protein and myoglobin from myocardia compared with I/R alone. The contents of ventricular myocardia cAMP after reperfusion with 10−8mol/L IMD1–47 and IMD8–47 were 130% and 91% higher, respectively, than that with I/R alone (all P<0.01). However, formations of myocardial MDA were 52% and 50% lower than that with I/R alone (all P<0.01), respectively. Interestingly, the above IMD effects were similar to those of adrenomedullin (10−8mol/L). These results suggest that IMD, like adrenomedullin, exerts cardio-protective effects against myocardial I/R injury.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?