Abstract:ObjectivesTo compare the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML)–based computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion mapping for functional assessment of coronary stenosis.MethodsBetween October 2020 and March 2022, consecutive participants with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) were prospectively enrolled and underwent coronary CTA, cardiac MR, and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) within 2 weeks. Cardiac MR perfusion analysis was quantified by stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Hemodynamically significant stenosis was defined as FFR ≤ 0.8 or > 90% stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The diagnostic performance of CT-FFR, MBF, and MPR was compared, using invasive FFR as a reference.ResultsThe study protocol was completed in 110 participants (mean age, 62 years ± 8; 73 men), and hemodynamically significant stenosis was detected in 36 (33%). Among the quantitative perfusion indices, MPR had the largest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.90) for identifying hemodynamically significant stenosis, which is in comparison with ML-based CT-FFR on the vessel level (AUC 0.89, p = 0.71), with comparable sensitivity (89% vs 79%, p = 0.20), specificity (87% vs 84%, p = 0.48), and accuracy (88% vs 83%, p = 0.24). However, MPR outperformed ML-based CT-FFR on the patient level (AUC 0.96 vs 0.86, p = 0.03), with improved specificity (95% vs 82%, p = 0.01) and accuracy (95% vs 81%, p < 0.01).ConclusionML-based CT-FFR and quantitative cardiac MR showed comparable diagnostic performance in detecting vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, whereas quantitative perfusion mapping had a favorable performance in per-patient analysis.Clinical relevance statementML-based CT-FFR and MPR derived from cardiac MR performed well in diagnosing vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, both of which showed no statistical discrepancy with each other.Key Points• Both machine learning (ML)–based computed tomography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) and quantitative perfusion cardiac MR performed well in the detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis.• Compared with stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) from quantitative perfusion cardiac MR, myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) provided higher diagnostic performance for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.• ML-based CT-FFR and MPR from quantitative cardiac MR perfusion yielded similar diagnostic performance in assessing vessel-specific hemodynamically significant stenosis, whereas MPR had a favorable performance in per-patient analysis.Graphical Abstract

Capability of differentiating smokers with normal pulmonary function from COPD patients: a comparison of CT pulmonary volume analysis and MR perfusion imaging

Probing Changes in Lung Physiology in COPD Using CT, Perfusion MRI, and Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI

Diagnostic Performance Of Perfusion Computed Tomography For Differentiating Lung Cancer From Benign Lesions: A Meta-Analysis

Contrast enhanced MRI does not detect differences in pulmonary perfusion between patients with long COVID and controls

Machine Learning and CT Texture Features in Ex-smokers with no CT Evidence of Emphysema and Mildly Abnormal Diffusing Capacity

Quantitative study on the degree of small airway disease and emphysema injury in pulmonary lobes of patients with smoking combined with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on biphasic CT

Quantification of pulmonary perfusion abnormalities using DCE-MRI in COPD: comparison with quantitative CT and pulmonary function

Quantitative analysis of CT images on lung volume, rating and integral on symptoms：a study on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with syndrome of lung-qi deficiency

Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation of lung cancer from obstructive lung consolidation: comparison and correlation with pharmacokinetic analysis from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging

Low-dose Spectral CT Perfusion Imaging of Lung Cancer Quantitative Analysis in Different Pathological Subtypes.

Multi-sfice CT pulmonary function evaluation in emphysema

Correlations of Computed Tomography Measurement of Distal Pulmonary Vascular Pruning with Airflow Limitation and Emphysema in COPD Patients

The Research Value of Biphasic Registration Quantitative Computed Tomography Emphysema Index in the Evaluation of Mild to Moderate COPD

Correlation between quantitative multi-detector computed tomography lung analysis and pulmonary function tests in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Comparison of machine learning–based CT fractional flow reserve with cardiac MR perfusion mapping for ischemia diagnosis in stable coronary artery disease

Application of 64-slice CT Lung Perfusion Imaging in Emphysema

Role of the Emphysema Index Combined with the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test Score in the Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Evaluation of the Severity of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with the Percentage of the Total Cross-Sectional Area of Small Pulmonary Vessels for the Lung Area in Multi-Slice CT

Discrimination between benign and malignant lung lesions using volumetric quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Diffusing capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment: A meta-analysis

Emphysema Extent on Computed Tomography is a Highly Specific Index in Diagnosing Persistent Airflow Limitation: a Real-World Study in China