Identification of differential inflammation factors in nephroblastoma tissue and clinical significance
Fei Guo,Junjie Zhang,Junfeng Sun,Jiyi Hu,Jiekai Yu,Shu Zheng,Jiaxiang Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2016.03.014
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To identify the differential inflammation factors in nephroblastoma tissue using proteomics technology and analyze its relationship with clinical stage,pathological phenotype,lymph node metastasis,vascular invasion.Methods From Jan 2010 to Dec 2014,nephroblastoma tumor tissues from 40 patients were obtained.Meanwhile,the 35 tissue near proximal kidney and 25 tissues distal kidney were also obtained.The classification of clinical stage included Ⅰ stage in 6 cases,Ⅱ stage in 12 cases,Ⅲ stage in 13 cases and Ⅳ stage in 9 cases.Other characters contained good prognosis type in 37 case,poor prognosis type in 3 cases,lymphatic metastasis in 17 cases,no sign of lymphatic metastasis in 23 cases,vascular invasion in 9 cases and non-vascular invasion in 31 cases.The SELDI-TOF-MS was used for screening differential protein peaks among three groups.Then,SPE and TRICINE-SDS-PAGE were used to separate and purificate the protein,which showed high peaks expression in tumor tissue,respectively.After in-gel digestion,we received the identification of targeted proteins according to sequence information through Nano-LC-MS/MS.Finally we compared differential expression of inflammatory peaks in different groups of clinical stage,pathological type,lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion.Results All the peaks high expression in tumor tissue,m/z12138 and m/z 13462 are identified as MIF and NAP-2.Expression of two protein peaks in tumor tissue(1437.8 + 997.3,1730.4 + 1147.8) is higher than those in proximal tissue (952.6 + 591.2,1031.1 + 1120.8) and in distal tissue(315.4 + 296.5,114.7 + 118.9),which showed the significant difference (P ＜ 0.001).According to the clinic stage classification,the expression of those protein were 678.8 + 189.0,746.2 + 238.7 in stage Ⅰ,664.0 + 202.0,1180.7 + 404.9 in stage Ⅱ,1524.7+407.9,2160.4 + 1252.3 in stage Ⅲ and 2850.2 + 861.2,2498.4 + 1290.5 in stage Ⅳ.Based on the other characters,expression of those protein were the 1271.7 + 809.2,1553.3 + 991.4 in good prognosis type,3487.2 + 166.2,3915.1 +507.3 in poor prognosis type,2207.1 +961.7,2569.5 + 1285.2 in lymph node metastasis,869.2 + 474.6,1110.2 + 433.6 in non-lymph node metastasis,2850.2 + 861.2,2498.4 +1290.5 in vascular invasion and 1027.8 + 521.3,1507.5 + 1019.9 in non-vascular invasion.All the comparison results have significant statistical difference (P ＜ 0.001).Conclusion MIF and NAP-2significantly increase in nephroblastoma tumor tissue.Meanwhile,there was obvious relationship between those protein with clinical stage,pathological type,lymph node metastasis and vascular invasion.