Quality improvement of care delivery of neonatal resuscitation training in a primary health care facility

WANG Ning,WANG Bao-sheng,GAO Ke,WANG Li-li,SONG Ming-wei,XU Feng,ZHANG Yong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6710.2013.04.008
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the significance in improvement of infant care delivery by promoting Neonatal Resuscitation Training Program in county hospitals. Methods This prospective observational case controlled study is supported by an international grant for "Effective Application of Neonatal Asphyxia. Resuscitation Program in Rural Areas of China & Australia" since April of 2009. The observation and the controlled groups of this study recruited 60 medical providers in each group matched in age, position and year in practice. Baseline confident level of medical providers, their performances in conducting neonatal asphyxia resuscitation, as well as their test scores in Neonatal Asphyxia Resuscitation Examination (full score: 38; pass score: 33) were collected prior to the beginning of the training program. From April 2009 to March 2012, providers in the observation group have completed the initial neonatal resuscitation course and annual recertification training. At the conclusion of the training program in March 2012, providers in the observation group were subjected to the same evaluations as the control group. Results In all the tests conducted, medical providers of all levels and specialties in the observation group have performed better compared to their matched controls. In resuscitation confident scores [pediatricians:(60.7±8.7) vs. (32.3±6.2); obstetricians:(64.3±7.7) vs. (35.7±7.2), anesthesiologists: (52.7±6.7) vs. (24.7±4.8), midwives: (65.0±6.8) vs. (36.3±7.5), all P<0.05 ; assessment ability scores during neonatal asphyxia resuscitation [pediatricians: (14.8±2.9) vs. (8.0±2.3), obstetricians: (16.0±2.3) vs. (9.0±2.1), midwives: (17.0±2.4) vs. (9.0±2.2); anesthesiologist (14.0±2.7) vs. (6.3±2.5), all P<0.05]; and the final exam scores [pediatricians (33.1±3.6) vs. obstetricians (33.4±3.7)], vs. anesthesiologist at (33.1±4.3) and midwives (33.2±2.1). Overall, 86.7% of providers in observation group have passed final exam. Conclusions Neonatal resuscitation training in medical providers of rural China is feasible and effective, can be recommended nationwide.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?