Abstract:Abstract Background The large majority of optimization problems related to the inference of distance‐based trees used in phylogenetic analysis and classification is known to be intractable. One noted exception is found within the realm of ultrametric distances. The introduction of ultrametric trees in phylogeny was inspired by a model of evolution driven by the postulate of a molecular clock, now dismissed, whereby phylogeny could be represented by a weighted tree in which the sum of the weights of the edges separating any given leaf from the root is the same for all leaves. Both, molecular clocks and rooted ultrametric trees, fell out of fashion as credible representations of evolutionary change. At the same time, ultrametric dendrograms have shown good potential for purposes of classification in so far as they have proven to provide good approximations for additive trees. Most of these approximations are still intractable, but the problem of finding the nearest ultrametric distance matrix to a given distance matrix with respect to the L ∞ distance has been long known to be solvable in polynomial time, the solution being incarnated in any minimum spanning tree for the weighted graph subtending to the matrix. Results This paper expands this subdominant ultrametric perspective by studying ultrametric networks , consisting of the collection of all edges involved in some minimum spanning tree. It is shown that, for a graph with n vertices, the construction of such a network can be carried out by a simple algorithm in optimal time O ( n 2 ) which is faster by a factor of n than the direct adaptation of the classical O ( n 3 ) paradigm by Warshall for computing the transitive closure of a graph. This algorithm, called UltraNet, will be shown to be easily adapted to compute relaxed networks and to support the introduction of artificial points to reduce the maximum distance between vertices in a pair. Finally, a few experiments will be discussed to demonstrate the applicability of subdominant ultrametric networks. Availability http://www.dei.unipd.it/~ciompin/main/Ultranet/Ultranet.html

On The Informational Asymmetry Between Upper And Lower Bounds For Ultrametric Evolutionary Trees

Parallel branch-and-bound algorithm for constructing evolutionary trees from distance matrix

3-Points Relationship Based Parallel Algorithm For Minimum Ultrametric Tree Construction

Approximation and Exact Algorithms for Constructing Minimum Ultrametric Trees from Distance Matrices.

Efficient parallel branch-and-bound algorithm for constructing minimum ultrametric trees

Ultrametric networks: a new tool for phylogenetic analysis

An efficient parallel algorithm for ultrametric tree construction based on 3PR

Nearly Tight Bounds on Testing of Metric Properties

Fitting Distances by Tree Metrics Minimizing the Total Error within a Constant Factor

Information Bounds Are Weak in the Shortest Distance Problem

Two Metrics on Rooted Unordered Trees with Labels

Application of Hierarchical Clustering in Evolutionary Tree Construction

Tree Edit Distance Cannot be Computed in Strongly Subcubic Time (Unless APSP Can)

Learning Ultrametric Trees for Optimal Transport Regression

A 3-factor approximation algorithm for a Maximum Acyclic Agreement Forest on k rooted, binary phylogenetic trees

An Improved Algorithm for the Maximum Agreement Subtree Problem

The algebraic $α$-Ford tree under evolution

Lower bounds for algebraic decision trees

On Two Measures of Distance between Fully-Labelled Trees

Branch Length Transforms using Optimal Tree Metric Matching

A 'stochastic safety radius' for distance-based tree reconstruction