Superior Vena Cava Reconstruction Using Biomaterials

Wei-dong LV,Feng-lei YU,Tie-hui HU,Zhong-shi WU,Ming-jiu CHEN,Xiang WANG,Wen-liang LIU,Yun-chang YUAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-6273.2007.02.024
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the methods and effects of reconstructing superior vena cava (SVC) using biomaterials after resection of SVC and its branches in patients with malignant mediastinal or pulmonary tumors through anterior mediastinoto- my.Patients and Methods:From May in 2003 to December in 2005,11 cases of patients with SVC obstruction underwent SVC reconstruction using bovine jugular vein conduits (BJVCs) or autologopus pericardial tubes,the central venous pressures (CVPs) were detected continuously before and after replacing the SVC,and the therapeutic results were followed up.Results:Of 12 biornaterial conduits used in 11 patients,7 were BJVCs,and 5 were autologopus pericardial tubes.One patients used both of the two conduits.The CVPs were increased berore operation [(26.2±2.8)cmH_2O],decreased after reconstruction [(20.8±2.0)cmH_2O, compared with before operation,P<0.05],and decreased all the more 48 hours after operation [(13.5±1.9)cmH_2O,compared with before operation,P<0.05].All patients survived operation and the grafts were patent without signs of obstruction after operation. One died in 5 weeks after operation because of respirative failure;two of them died of recurrence from primary carcinoma 7 and 11 months after operation;the others have been alive and remains free from signs and symptoms of SVG obstruction except that metastasis was found in vertebrae in one patients.Conclusions:The initial result supports autologopus pericardial tube or BJVC as an acceptable alternative for SVG reconstruction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?