The Spatial Variation of Soil Structure Fractal Derived from Particle Size Distributions at the Basin Scale
Yujiang He,Borui Peng,Lei Dai,Yanyan Wang,Ying Liu,Guiling Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8100570
IF: 3.577
2024-09-29
Fractal and Fractional
Abstract:The accurate characterization of soil structure is fundamental to groundwater science, environmental ecology, and Earth systems science. To address the challenge of quantifying the high spatial variability of large-scale soil structures, this study used a laser particle size analyzer to measure the distribution of soil particle size in 207 samples from ten profiles across the Daqing and Ziya River basins in the North China Plain. The quantified soil structure, expressed as soil fractal dimension D, was derived using monofractal theory. Various spatial analysis techniques, including Moran's I index, correlation analysis heat maps, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov one-sample test, and geostatistical semivariogram function, were jointly applied to investigate the spatial variability of soil structural fractals across different depths in the piedmont plain–coastal areas of the two river basins. The results indicate the following: (1) Quantitative analysis confirms that under the influence of piedmont alluvial and fluvial dynamics, soil D values homogenize from the piedmont to the coastal areas, with decreasing particle size differences closer to the coast. However, the spatial variability of the soil structural fractals in the Ziya River Basin was greater than that in the Daqing River Basin. (2) The combined effects of climate change, regional differences, and human activity led to greater spatial variability in the soil structural fractals in the Ziya River Basin than in the Daqing River Basin. The correlation between D values and burial depth was strongest in the Xianxian profile (−0.78), whereas the spatial correlation was strongest in the Hengshui and Dacheng profiles (−0.47). (3) The greatest spatial variability in soil D values occurred at depths of 1–2 m, with a coefficient of variation of 23.595%, which was significantly higher than those at depths of 0–1 (14.569%) and 2–3 m (16.284%).
mathematics, interdisciplinary applications