Comparison of real-time shear wave elastography and ultrasonography in diagnosis of liver cirrhosis

ZHENG Jian,HUANG Ze-ping,ZHENG Rong-qin,ZENG Jie,REN Jie,GUO Huan-yi,WU Tao,ZENG Qing-jin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2013.12.012
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare real-time shear wave elastography(SWE) with conventional ultrasonography in diagnosis of compensated and decompensated liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Methods From January 2012 to April 2013, 134 patients with chronic liver disease in Third Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University were included. Real-time SWE and conventional ultrasonography were performed on the same day of liver biopsy. Conventional ultrasonography scores including liver surface, parenchyma and splenic size were used to assess liver cirrhosis. The pathological findings were used as the reference standard. And the diagnostic accuracy was assessed with receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve. The area under ROC curves were compared with Z test. Results For liver fibrosis degree, patients were 10 at stage S0, 31 at S1, 8 at S2, 13 at S3, 34 at S4 and 38 for decompensated liver cirrhosis. The area under ROC curves of SWE and conventional ultrasonography for compensated liver cirrhosis were 0.957 and 0.745 respectively, which indicated that real-time SWE was better than conventional ultrasonography scores(Z=3.789, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of SWE and conventional ultrasonography were 97.06% and 93.55%, 52.94% and 87.10% respectively. While the area under ROC curves for decompensated liver cirrhosis of SWE and conventional ultrasonography were 0.973 and 0.954 respectively, which indicated no difference between real-time SWE and conventional ultrasonography scores(Z=0.276, P=0.511). The sensitivity and specificity of SWE and conventional ultrasonography were 100% and 93.55%, 94.74% and 87.10% respectively. Conclusions SWE has higher accuracy in assessment of compensated liver cirrhosis than conventional ultrasonography. But there was no significant difference between SWE and conventional ultrasonography in evaluation of decompensated liver cirrhosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?