Q inversion and comparative analysis among three methods for VSP data: CFS, SR, and AA
Yinting Wu,Guangming Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13960017.1
2016-01-01
SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
Abstract:Previous No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016Q inversion and comparative analysis among three methods for VSP data: CFS, SR, and AAAuthors: Yinting WuGuangming ZhuYinting WuChang'an UniversitySearch for more papers by this author and Guangming ZhuChang'an UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13960017.1 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract The seismic attenuation characterized by Quality Factor (Q), is one of the key properties to reveal different stratums. This paper is aimed at discussing influencing factors of Q inversion and providing references for practical application. We elaborate three different methods to inverse Q value with VSP data, including Centroid Frequency Shift (CFS) method, Spectral Ratio (SR) method, and Amplitude Attenuation (AA) method. Comparison between the results from CFS with the other two methods is conducted on frequency band width, high Q value layers, wave field components, interface interference and thin layers. Results show that, CFS method is more stable and accurate than the other two methods for dealing with different wavefields, thin and high Q layers. Frequency band width influences inversed effects of all the three methods. The band wider, the results better. Moreover, from the application of a series of field VSP data, we can see that the Q curve of CFS method coincides with geological layers better than those of the others, which are hardly to reflect the main attenuation trend. Presentation Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 Start Time: 4:35:00 PM Location: Lobby D/C Presentation Type: POSTER Keywords: Q, VSP, attenuationPermalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13960017.1FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byEstimation of the Filling Distribution and Height Levels Inside an Insulated Pressure Vessel by Guided Elastic Wave Attenuation Tomography29 December 2020 | Sensors, Vol. 21, No. 1 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2016 Pages: 5654 publication data© 2016 Published in electronic format with permission by the Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished Online: 01 Sep 2016 CITATION INFORMATION Yinting Wu and Guangming Zhu, (2016), "Q inversion and comparative analysis among three methods for VSP data: CFS, SR, and AA," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 5633-5637. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13960017.1 Plain-Language Summary KeywordsQVSPattenuationPDF DownloadLoading ...